Connect with us

Comparisons

Moto X vs Moto G: performance in the new generations

blank

Published

on

moto-x-vs-moto-g-performace-for-different-users

The Moto X and Moto G, both second generation devices from 2014, are two of the most popular smartphones on the U.S. market and in the world, and with good reason. Besides being affordable handsets, they also offer near-stock Android interface that is the closest you can get to pure Android at the moment. Even if OEMs have seen the potential of a customizable and clean OS on their smartphones, there is a good amount of reluctance towards removing bloatware from companies and carriers as well. The Moto X and Moto G from last year are good examples of how to make crowd-pleasing devices that can keep their price down, all the while offering top-notch performance in their niche.

While the Moto X is the flagship device from Motorola, the Moto G is one of the favorites when it comes to mid-range smartphones right now. Although the Android 5.0 Lollipop rollout has negatively affected many Moto G and Moto X users, the overall user experience with these devices is positive. If it wasn’t for the annoying memory leak bug that will be fixed with the upcoming Android 5.1.1 Lollipop update, the software experience on both these devices would be excellent. There still are pesky bugs with Android Lollipop impacting the Moto G and Moto X, but largely they can be bypassed for the time being with a few fixes and third-party apps.

This comparison between the Moto X and Moto G 2014 will analyze performance on both these devices and will end up with a conclusion that aims to recommend either option one or option two for a specific segment of smartphone enthusiasts. Although it is clear that the Moto X is the better smartphone from the beginning, that doesn’t mean that the Moto G has no value for the average smartphone user. In terms of performance and compared to their own segments of the market, both the Moto X and Moto G perform above expectations and manage to garner and keep a pretty large fanbase. Although Motorola might have been struggling in the past few years, with the launch of the original Moto X and Moto G as well as the second generations, combined with the Nexus 6, Droid Turbo and the Moto 360 smart watch, the company is making a strong comeback that might even make Google regret the sale of the company to Chinese giant Lenovo.

First off, let’s see why the Moto X is the flagship and why the Moto G is the crowd-favorite when it comes to budget smartphones. The Moto X was launched in September 2014 alongside the Moto G and both were met with positive reviews and appreciation for their low price tags. Currently, the unlocked Moto X can be bought for the price of $400, while the Moto G 2014 price is set at around $180 in most retailer stores. Those are rather affordable prices, even if they aren’t the cheapest smartphones you can get. As we’ve mentioned, the Moto X is the flagship of the two, which means it gets superior specs and hardware, and has a superior performance rating from all of the reviewers and users that have acquired the phone.

The Moto X gets a 5.2 inch AMOLED display with a 1080*1920 resolution that adds up to 424 ppi pixel density, which is a decent resolution and display for a smartphone that is no longer the latest edition from the company. On the flipside, the Moto G gets a 5 inch display with a slightly lower resolution of 720*1280 which adds up to about 294 ppi pixel density. That’s not optimal and the IPS LCD display is below the quality of the AMOLED panel of the Moto X, but it still makes for a rather good viewing experience, even in outdoor environments. Below the hood, the Moto X gets a pretty beefy Snapdragon 801 CPU which is backed up by 2 GB RAM and either 16 or 32 GB internal storage. There’s also a pure edition available and an AT&T and T-Mobile variant which get even more internal storage, namely 64 GB. You don’t get a microSD card slot on the Moto X, which came as a disappointment to a few Motorola fans, but most can make due without it. The Moto G 2014 specs include an inferior Snapdragon 400 CPU, which could be better, backed by 1 GB RAM and 8 GB internal storage. That’s not a bad setup for a mid-range smartphone, but it certainly makes a lot of difference when it comes to performance.

The camera setup on both these phones is below the average of their niche, but most people and reviewers are pretty content with what these phones can do in terms of photography and video recording. Moreover, they are considered to be significantly improved compared to their predecessors from 2013, which acts in the favor of Motorola and sets a standard for future releases. The Moto X camera on the rear is a 13 MP sensor with a dual-LED flash and autofocus, and it is capable of recording 2160p video at 30fps, which is pretty admirable. The Moto G rear camera is an 8 MP shooter with a generic LED flash and autofocus, which can shoot video of 720p at 30 fps. For a mid-range smartphone, that is an acceptable setup. Both phones have sub-par 2 MP front facing cameras, which are enough for the occasional selfie, but not for much more.

When it comes to battery capacity, both these phones pride themselves with above average battery life, but nothing that you could write home about. The Moto G was negatively impacted by Android Lollipop, which has turned the battery life from one above average to one that is on the border of average, even slightly below. Once Android 5.1 hits the mid-ranger, users and Motorola as well believe that battery life issues will be mended, although the memory leak bug will have to wait until Android 5.1.1 according to our sources. Regardless of OS, we’re going to be looking at performance with the OS out of the box, which is Android 4.4.4 KitKat for both the Moto X and Moto G. The Moto X gets a standard issue non-removable 2300 mAh battery, while the Moto G lingers behind with a non-removable 2070 mAh battery pack.

With near-stock Android, both the Moto X and Moto G offer smooth user experiences, and there are few accounts of lag occurring on either of these phones. Although the user experience might be great on both these phones, the Moto X has an advantage when it comes to performance thanks to the superior hardware it hosts. The baseline is, as it should be, that the flagship model is faster and runs games and apps much smoother than the mid-range counterpart. That being said, one should not expect the Moto G to put up with all the strain that the Moto X can handle without flaws. Nonetheless, it all depends on the user and their preferences, as well as usage habits. While the Moto G is suitable for the average smartphone user, the Moto X caters more to power-users. But what makes a user average and what makes the power users?

The Moto G is suitable for average smartphone users, who can be loosely defined by how they use their phones and what they use it for. The average smartphone user first and foremost will use this phone for calling and messaging, as well as internet browsing and chatting. With Google Chrome, the Moto G works rather fast, although loading times can suffer a bit when multiple tabs are open or multiple third-party applications are running in the background. Performance when browsing the internet is also, sadly, affected by the memory leak bug, which will occasionally cause Chrome to crash for no apparent reason. The same can happen with other applications or games too, as the root of the problem is RAM not being managed correctly. But since that only happens in Lollipop as far as we know, we won’t include that as a minus for the handset. If your Moto G is on KitKat, it will run flawlessly almost, with no random crashes affecting the user experience.

The  average user also usually uses social media, and the Moto G can handle Twitter, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Youtube, Hangouts, WhatsApp and Snapchat like a breeze, all the while you’re not constantly switching between them. The occasional lag will be there in Snapchat and when loading videos in Youtube, but not so much as to turn the experience inherently bad and annoying. Browsing through Facebook and Twitter is ok, although the constant updates do take a toll on the Moto G on occasion. Besides these social networking apps and messaging apps, average users will game, and the Moto G can handle that in an average manner. The top games like Despicable Me, Plants vs Zombies 2, Badlands, World of Goo won’t be smooth and they might not even run. But games like Candy Crush, Flappy Bird, Angry Birds, Cut the Rope, Doodle, Jewels and such will be a breeze, although intense gaming for long periods of time will overheat the Moto G and lag will eventually set in. But if your gaming sessions aren’t longer than half an hour, the Moto G probably won’t even break a sweat.

That’s largely what the average smartphone user uses their phone for, aside from apps like Google Maps, Google Now, Google Keep and other stock ones. Google Maps will stutter on the Moto G, but not as much as to render it unusable, so it can definitely handle navigation in an ok manner. But it won’t do Google Earth or satellite images as well, to be frank, it will be a pain to try using those. They’ll stutter and lag and won’t work as they are supposed to, so if you’re a fan of those, the Moto G might not be the best fit for you. Listening to music through third-party apps or Google Play Music won’t be a challenge, and the phone won’t freeze up if you’re streaming from the cloud with an app like Beat cloud music.

Camera performance on the Moto G is not as smooth as one would like it to be, but the camera does respond rather fast and you won’t have trouble switching between photo and video modes. Processing will be annoying though, as it can take a surprisingly long time on occasion. If you want to get to the camera from the lock screen, you’re going to have to time things right, because it takes the Moto G quite a few seconds to process your request. The shutter is responsive though, and the camera app is also smooth in performance, so overall it’s a good experience, but not the best.

When it comes to the Moto X and its targeted power users, it is more difficult to define what a power user is. Defining the habits of a power user is difficult because each power user has a different approach towards their smartphone. First off, power users can be those that play a lot of games, and not the standard issue games that don’t need that much processing power, rather games like Asphalt 8, Despicable Me, Plants vs Zombies 2, Golden Manage, The Sims, Game of Thrones from Telltale and so on. These games will run smoothly on the Moto X, with almost no lag or problems with the experience. But that’s yet again only valid with moderate gaming sessions of about 40 minutes or so. If you tend to stay in that game for more than an hour, be prepared to encounter the occasional app crash or some lag.

The standard apps like social networking, video viewing and messaging apps work like a charm on the Moto X, and you’ll probably never get lag when you’re consuming media, which is a good trait of the phone. Switching between apps won’t be cumbersome nor annoying, and the transitioning won’t lag too often, but it will happen once in a while. The camera is much more responsive than with the Moto G or the first generation Moto X, which is a plus for the second generation smartphone from Motorola. Its camera software and post-processing have also been sped up a tad, which means accessing and maneuvering the camera won’t cause problems, generally. As with any software or hardware, there can be glitches and problems, which is unavoidable in my opinion. But the overall photography and video recording experience with the Moto X is rather admirable.

The standard issue stock apps work like a charm on the Moto X, and multitasking is a breeze for most power users whom we’ve spoken to. Resource hungry apps tend to function without a problem on the Moto X, and so do real-time apps such as Google AdSense, Analytics or any other tracking software one might use. At the same time, fitness tracking apps also work without a hitch, which is a good sing of sensor calibration and the relationship they have with the app and software doing the tracking. Media consumption such as high-res videos and audio are just as good as on any other flagship and you probably won’t encounter any freezing whatsoever, no matter if you’re using Wi-Fi, 3G or 4G LTE. That’s the beauty of the Moto X: even when the internet connection is using up a lot of resources and juice, it still manages to, well, manage power and resources in just the right way.

The Moto X is truly one of the best smartphones of 2014 when it comes to performance, and it has become a crowd-favorite because it demonstrates that high-end specs don’t always mean super-fast performance. The Moto X 2014 packs pretty average specs, which are pretty far off from more recent smartphones that were launched last year and this year, but still manages to come off with super-fast performance. The Moto X can handle anything you throw at it and it won’t break a sweat, all the while keeping the price down and keeping software as stock as possible.

Since I can’t allow myself to define a power user or an average user and masquerade that definition as truth, I’m going to ask you, our readers, to let us know what kind of users you are. If you consider yourself an average smartphone user, tell us what apps you use on a daily basis and for what. If you think you’re the power user we’re trying to talk about, help us out and let us know your app and game preferences. How do you think your usage habits affect the performance of a phone and the overall user experience? Do you think a power user would be able to use the Moto G as their daily driver? Do you think that a power user would be content with using the Moto X or should they look at even more powerful hardware? Since the newly announced One M9 and Galaxy S6 aren’t available for consumers yet, you can’t include them as possible options, as we’re trying to promote personal experience with gadgets ahead of judging based on paper. So, what would your verdict be?

 

As part of the editorial team here at Geekreply, John spends a lot of his time making sure each article is up to snuff. That said, he also occasionally pens articles on the latest in Geek culture. From Gaming to Science, expect the latest news fast from John and team.

Comparisons

4 Most Interesting Crossovers in Gaming

blank

Published

on

blank

Gaming crossovers are a great way to bring in new people and drive up interest in a title. With that being said, crossovers aren’t as rare as they once were. More and more gaming companies are now embracing crossovers, to the point that some may say that it has lost its appeal. And while this is true to some degree, there are still crossovers that are really effective when it comes to adding a whole new dimension to a game. To prove our point, we’ve put together a list of five of the most interesting crossovers.

Forza Horizon 4: Halo

Forza Horizon 4 is the eleventh installment in the Forza series. The Forza series is known for its ability to emulate realistic racing conditions and offer accurate representations of real-world cars. And while they’ve partnered with car manufacturers before, Forza Horizon 4 features one of the most interesting collaborations in the entire series.

For a series that prides itself on realistic racing, Forza also knows when to cut loose and have a little fun. Nothing exemplifies this more than the Halo crossover that features Master Chief and the iconic Warthog.

Fortnite: Travis Scott


Fortnite is no stranger to crossovers. But if we had to pick one as the most interesting it would have to be the Travis Scott concert. Not only did this crossover include custom skins and emotes but it also paved the way for one of the most unique digital experiences of 2020.

The Verge’s article on the Travis Scott crossover details that the crossover included an interactive digital concert that turned the Fortnite island into a music stage. What’s great about this crossover is that it hints towards a future wherein music and video games will be working hand in hand to deliver immersive musical experiences to millions of people from all over the world.

Merge Dragons: Rick and Morty



When you think of the popular TV show Rick and Morty, a fantasy puzzle game isn’t the first thing that comes to mind. This is what makes this Rick and Morty crossover so interesting. The sheer absurdity of this crossover shows what gaming collaborations can achieve when one thinks outside the box. The game features original dialogue spoken by the characters that matches their characteristics from the show. It is a fun addition to the puzzle game.

However, this crossover shouldn’t be too surprising as Rick and Morty have appeared in other games, demonstrating how they have become pop culture icons. The comic nature of the duo makes them perfect for every type of genre, including slot games. Foxy Bingo’s pop cultured-themed slots include an official Rick and Morty game that features the iconic imagery and characters from the show. The show has also produced its own game in the form of the Pokémon-clone Pocket Mortys. One thing that all of these games have in common is that they maintain the show’s penchant for fun and wacky adventures. This is seen in Merge Dragons with the exclusive cow-dragon hybrid featured in the crossover event.

Mortal Kombat 11: Rambo


While crossovers in fighting games aren’t exactly new, Mortal Kombat has always had a knack for creating interesting crossovers for their iconic fighting game. One way that they’ve done this is with the inclusion of popular film characters. The franchise has had everyone from the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to Jason of the Friday the 13th franchise appear in their games.

However, the latest iteration of the game may have topped all of the previous crossovers. This is because Mortal Kombat 11 features John Rambo of the legendary Rambo franchise as one of its available fighters. To add to this, CNet’s article on Mortal Kombat 11 details that Sylvester Stallone voiced the digital John Rambo. This is certainly a treat for fans of the popular action film franchise, as they can finally play as one of the most influential action heroes of all time.

Continue Reading

Comparisons

Loot Crate vs. The Curiosity Box: A Beginner’s Guide to Subscription Mystery Boxes

blank

Published

on

blank

With all the loot box shenanigans we’ve witnessed this year, you might have, while searching for more information, accidentally stumbled across something by the name of Loot Crate. Unlike the reviled loot boxes, Loot Crate isn’t a digital gambling scam. Instead, Loot Crate is a physical, subscription-based mystery box you receive in the mail that contains a bevy of geek-related material. Moreover, Loot Crate isn’t the only available service. Alongside the vanilla Loot Crate Classic, the Loot Crate company supplies geeks with anime-themed items with Loot Anime, gaming swag with Loot Gaming (Loot Crate also sells HaloMinecraftFalloutCall of Duty, and Destiny 2 themed boxes), and film/TV merchandise with Harry PotterFireflyMarvel, and Star Trek themed boxes. Loot Crate also has a rival in the form of Geek Fuel, which is more expensive than Loot Crate Classic but contains more (and more expensive) merchandise. While I don’t have a Geek Fuel box to compare to a Loot Crate, I received a different subscription box for Christmas, The Curiosity Box. This mystery box is a joint venture between the company behind Geek Fuel and the YouTube Channel VSauce, which is admittedly cool. So, without further ado, let’s get into what sets apart a Loot Crate from a Curiosity Box and determine which is right for you.

WHAT’S THE SAME

On the surface, Loot Crate and The Curiosity Box seem similar. They arrive in big cardboard boxes and contain random items. Well, not precisely random; each box focuses on a different theme, and the items provided center around that theme. While a lot of geeks subscribe to these boxes for various bits of swag, perhaps the biggest draw is the exclusives. The companies behind these subscription services make deals with other firms to create unique pieces of merchandise that are literally impossible to find anywhere else, aftermarket/marked up eBay sales notwithstanding. Some of these exclusives are just color variants of readily available products, such as a glow in the dark Funko POP Groot figure and orange Quantum Mechanix Tribble.

blank

Most exclusives, however, aren’t available elsewhere in any other form and include items like the The Walking Dead art print, the Yeti temporary tattoo, the tower of magnetic rings, and “collectible” pins.

blank

Furthermore, while most exclusives are decorative, some are practical items, such as a pen shaped like the Sledge Saw from Dead Rising 3 and light-up beverage coasters with periodic symbols.

blank

Finally, these subscription boxes have some of the most awesome, exclusive, geeky shirts this side of ThinkGeek or Hot Topic.

blank

The exclusive items tend to be the best pieces of merchandise in each box and are usually worth the price of the subscription alone. Usually.

WHAT’S DIFFERENT

Let’s get this out of the way: the most obvious differences are the prices and subscription models. Loot Crate Classic is about $20 per box and comes once a month, while The Curiosity Box is well over $50 and arrives once every three months. More importantly, these boxes are designed for two completely different audiences. The Loot Crate (and likely by extension Geek Fuel) is aimed primarily at adults or older teenagers and provides geek-related decorations and practical items, such as the Dead Rising 3 pen, Star Wars and Deadpool fridge magnets, and a Mega Man car air freshener.

blank

Also, Loot Crate tends to include non-exclusive products that are part of a series. Case in point, during my brief stint with Loot Crate, I received (among other things) a Kidrobot Glow in the Dark Ooze Action Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle vinyl figure and a Funko ReAction Alien figure. I got Donatello and the titular Alien, respectively, but I easily could have found Leonardo or Ripley in my Loot Crate subscriptions instead. However, since The Curiosity Box is almost exclusively made up of exclusive items, there is no element of randomness and everyone receives the same merchandise.

blank

While Loot Crate caters to the video game, movies, comics, television, and everything pop-culture side of geekdom, The Curiosity Box is more science oriented and is designed for the family. For example, parents who bought the Summer 2017 Curiosity Box got to enjoy a t-shirt, a set of periodic table beverage coasters, a magnetic ring tower, a t-shirt, and a Nikola Tesla (as a sloth) enamel pin, while children will have fun with a temporary tattoo, a unique embroidered sticker patch, a solar system wall decal and poster set, a mobile microscope, and a castle cross-sections book. Finally, the Summer 2017 Curiosity Box came with the Universe Sandbox 2 Steam game, which is fun for all ages.

blank

Since each Loot Crate and Curiosity Box contains new themes and items, you might find the contents of one particular box more to your liking than another. For example, one Curiosity Box contained a “grow your own glow in the dark crystals” kit, while another included a plush of The Curiosity Box’s mascot, the orange octopus Inq. Meanwhile, past Loot Crates have contained a Batman mug, a Doom Marine Funko POP figure, and the One-Punch Man manga.

While I only have personal experience with Loot Crate and The Curiosity Box, they are not your only options for subscription boxes. Geek Fuel is another decent mystery box, and it has come with its fair share of good products, including a South Park: The Fractured But Whole shirt, a Loony Toons Kidrobot blind box vinyl figure, and an exclusive Legend of Zelda pixel sword power bank. While I cannot recommend the Loot Crate, Curiosity Box, or Geek Fuel (or other) subscription boxes enough, you should research each to know what you should expect from these services. Sure, you technically can’t know what to expect since each box is supposed to be a mystery, but look into each specific subscription and figure out which one is right for you. Which do you think tends to have the best exclusives? Which box caters to your interests? These questions are important and will severely impact your enjoyment. Of course, luck also plays a big role, but that’s also part of the fun.

Continue Reading

Android

Google Drive will Shut Down in 2018

blank

Published

on

Drive

It seems like yesterday when Google introduced Google Drive 5 years ago. Back then, people didn’t have a good grasp about what Cloud Storage did. Nowadays, there are many Cloud Storage services that it’s only a matter of preference to choose one for your file keeping needs. However, what struck me as an oddity was how Google Drive will pull their Google Drive service come 2018.

That’s right, Google Drive will completely shut down on March 12, 2018. With the software no longer being supported on December 11, 2017. People will have several warnings about this, for now, so they will have plenty of chance to switch to the new version of Drive, Backup and Sync.

This new program is basically a combination of the features between Google Drive and Photos. It’s readily available now for Windows and OSX systems and will be the new host for the Cloud storage. Alternatively, users can get a hold of Drive File Stream, which will become available on September 26, 2017.

The core differences between DFS and BaS come when you compare how they help customers. As shown in the image below:

dRIVE

A day without Google Drive.

It seems like users will have their first experience without Drive today though. Because as of this morning, the service was down for many users who constantly used the GSuit app. According to the independent site Downdetector, more than 7,000 users are experiencing issues with the service. This has been going on since 10:04 AM EDT, but the number of reports has been lowering afterward. You can check the stats here.

Thousands of users reported Google Drive issues

It’s a shame to see Google Drive go. To be frank, it was my preferred Cloud Storage option besides MEGA. However, it’s not a huge inconvenience considering they are not shutting down a Cloud Storage service altogether. So we at least have that.

Continue Reading

Trending