Connect with us

Artificial Intelligence

Financial data from users’ tax filing websites has been sent to Facebook

blank

Published

on

blank

Services including TaxAct, TaxSlayer, and H&R Block were discovered transferring confidential data by the Markup.
The Markup has found that major tax preparation companies including H&R Block, TaxAct, and TaxSlayer have been covertly sending private financial data to Facebook when Americans file their taxes online.

Data on names and email addresses as well as frequently even more specific information, such as information on users’ income, filing status, refund amounts, and dependents’ college scholarship amounts, are provided through a commonly used code known as the Meta Pixel.
Whether or whether the person utilizing the tax filing service has an account on Facebook or other platforms run by its owner Meta, the information transmitted to the firm can be utilized to power its advertising algorithms.

The Internal Revenue Service processes around 150 million computerized individual tax returns each year, and The Markup discovered that the pixel is used by some of the most popular e-filing firms.

For instance, users of the well-known service TaxAct are required to give personal information in order to calculate their returns, such as their income and investment information. According to an examination by The Markup, a pixel on TaxAct’s website then relayed some of that information to Facebook, including users’ filing status, their AGI, and the size of their return. Refunds were rounded up to the nearest hundred and income to the nearest thousand. Additionally, the pixel transmitted dependents’ names in an obscured but typically reversible manner.

The Markup discovered comparable financial data—but not names—being provided to Google through its service by TaxAct, which claims to have about 3 million “consumer and professional users” on its website.
The Meta Pixel was used by other tax filing services besides TaxAct. The world’s largest provider of tax preparation services, H&R Block, which additionally provides an online filing option that draws millions of customers each year, integrated a pixel on its website that collected data on users’ use of health savings accounts and the grants and costs associated with dependents’ college tuition.

As part of Facebook’s “advanced matching” system, which collects information on website visitors in an effort to connect them to Facebook accounts, TaxSlayer, a different popular filing service, submitted personal information to the social media corporation. Phone numbers, the name of the user filling out the form, and the names of any dependents added to the return were among the data collected by the pixel on TaxSlayer’s website. Similar to TaxAct, Facebook was able to link a user to an existing profile despite the fact that precise demographic information about the person was obscured. According to TaxSlayer, 10 million federal and state tax returns were completed last year.

The Markup also discovered the pixel code on a tax preparation website run by Ramsey Solutions, a firm that provides software and financial planning services and makes use of a TaxSlayer service. From a tax return summary page, that pixel collected even more sensitive data, such as details on income and refund amounts. This information was only supplied after users clicked drop-down headings to view more of their report’s details on the website.
The pixel was used by even Intuit, the business that handles America’s leading online file system. However, Intuit’s TurboTax only sent usernames and the most recent sign-in time to Meta instead of financial information. The company completely removed the pixel from all sites after sign-in.

The protection of our customers’ data is something we take very seriously, according to Nicole Coburn, a TaxAct spokesman, in an email. “TaxAct always attempts to abide by all IRS laws.” The business “frequently evaluate[s] our processes as part of our continuous commitment to privacy, and will assess the information,” according to H&R Block spokesperson Angela Davied.

In an email, Ramsey Solutions spokesperson Megan McConnell stated that the business “installed the Meta Pixel to give a more tailored customer experience.”

The statement read, “We did NOT know and were never told that Facebook was collecting personal tax information through the Pixel.” We quickly notified TaxSlayer to deactivate the Pixel from Ramsey SmartTax as soon as we learned of it.

TaxSlayer removed the pixel to assess its use, according to spokesman Molly Richardson, who responded to The Markup’s email. She said that Ramsey Solutions “decided to remove the pixel” as well, stressing that “our customers’ privacy is of the utmost importance” and that “we take concerns regarding our customers’ information extremely seriously.”

While Intuit “may share some non-tax-return information, such as username, with marketing partners to deliver a better customer experience,” like not showing Intuit ads on Facebook to people who have accounts already, the company’s pixel “does not track, gather, or share information that users enter in TurboTax while filing their taxes.” The business claimed to be in accordance with laws but changed the pixel so that usernames are no longer sent.
The Markup’s results, according to Mandi Matlock, a tax law lecturer at Harvard Law School, reveal that taxpayers are “giving some of the most sensitive information that they own, and it’s being exploited.”

This is horrible, she remarked. “It is, really.”

After The Markup approached TaxAct for comment, the company’s website stopped sending financial information to Meta on Monday, but it still received dependents’ identities. The website kept sending Google Analytics money-related data. Additionally, as of Monday, TurboTax ceased sending usernames through the pixel at sign-in, and TaxSlayer and Ramsey Solutions disabled the pixel from their tax filing websites. The website for H&R Block was still disseminating information on college tuition assistance and health savings accounts.

How Meta Pixel monitors users
Anyone who wants the pixel code can get it for free from Meta, which gives companies the freedom to use it wherever they want on their websites.

The businesses and Facebook both benefit from using the code. When a customer visits a company’s website, the pixel may keep track of the things they browsed, like a T-shirt, for instance. The company can locate an audience that could already be interested in its items by targeting its Facebook advertisements to people who looked at that shirt.
Meta also benefits financially. The business claims it can use the information it gathers from devices like the pixel to power its algorithms, giving it knowledge of people’ online behaviors.

Facebook has seen success with this tactic. The business informed Congress in 2018 that there were over 2 million pixels on the web, a significant data collection effort that most internet users never saw.

The technique is widespread, according to Jon Callas, director of public interest technology at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who described his reaction to The Markup’s findings as “shock but not surprise.”

The Markup’s analysis of sensitive data collection shows that some of it is related to the Meta Pixel’s default behaviors, while other instances appear to be the result of customizations made by tax filing services, people working on their behalf, or other software that has been installed on the website.

For instance, the normal setup of the Meta Pixel automatically collects the title of a page the user is seeing, along with the web address of the page and other data. This is how Meta Pixel gathered health savings account and college spending information from the H&R Block website. It was able to obtain salary data from Ramsey Solutions because it was presented as a summary that could be enlarged by clicking. The pixel identified the summary as being a button, because by default, the pixel captures text from a clicked button.
Automatic advanced matching was a feature used in the TaxSlayer and TaxAct pixels. This function examines forms for areas where it suspects there may be personally identifiable data, such as a phone number, first name, last name, or email address, and then transmits any such data it finds to Meta. This function on TaxSlayer’s website gathered contact information and the names of taxpayers and their dependents. It gathered dependents’ names on TaxAct.

According to Meta, the hashing method used to encrypt the data supplied by the matching feature is done so in order to “help preserve user privacy.” The pre-obfuscated version of the data may, however, usually be found by the corporation. In fact, Meta specifically used the hashed data to connect additional pixel data to Facebook and Instagram identities.

When The Markup created a test pixel linked to a business account, this pixel functionality was disabled by default but could be enabled by selecting a toggle during setup.

A “custom event,” which is sent only if the pixel is specified outside of the default by a website operator or another application the website operator adds to their site, is what TaxAct used to send dollar figures like adjusted gross income to Meta. Inquiries about whether and why TaxAct configured the pixel in this way went unanswered.

There are restrictions on the kinds of data that Meta claims the pixel will allow it to gather. The corporation claims that it uses automatic filtering to block potentially sensitive data and does not want sensitive information, including financial data, delivered to it. According to its help center, providing information such as bank account or credit card details or “knowledge regarding an individual’s financial account or status” is prohibited.

Still, The Markup discovered that two tax sites supplied Facebook one specific form of banned data – income. TaxAct may have also been transmitting a parameter with the name “student loan interest” before the pixel started filtering it before it was delivered, according to data it supplied to Facebook.
The Markup monitored websites’ pixel usage from January to July of this year as part of the Pixel Hunt, a collaboration with Mozilla Rally. Participants in the initiative installed a browser extension that gave The Markup a copy of all the information given with Meta via the pixel.

Through data given by Pixel Hunt participants, The Markup first learned that tax preparers were disclosing sensitive information. The Markup subsequently created accounts on the businesses’ websites and used the “Network” portion of Chrome DevTools, a feature included with Google’s Chrome browser, to reproduce and validate the data.

The Markup discovered sensitive data transferred to Facebook earlier this year with the aid of Pixel Hunt participants on the Education Department’s federal student aid application website, crisis pregnancy websites, and the websites of prominent hospitals.

Because Meta gathers so much information, occasionally even the firm doesn’t know where it goes. In a leaked memo from Facebook’s privacy engineers earlier this year, Vice reported that the firm couldn’t guarantee it wouldn’t use specific data for specific objectives because it “does not have an acceptable level of control and explainability over how our systems use data.”
Facebook has “extensive systems and controls to handle data and comply with privacy standards,” a corporate spokeswoman claimed at the time, according to Vice.

Dale Hogan, a representative for Meta, referred to the organization’s policies on sensitive financial information in answer to The Markup’s inquiries over the use of the pixel by the tax websites.

Hogan stated in an email that advertisers “should not transmit sensitive information about people through our Business Tools.” “Doing so is against our regulations, and we train advertisers on how to set up Business tools correctly to avoid this,” the statement reads. Our technology is built to weed out any potentially sensitive information it can find.

An email from a Google representative, Jackie Berté, stated that the company “has strict policies against advertising to people based on sensitive information” and that Google Analytics data is “obfuscated, meaning it is not tied back to an individual.” Additionally, she added, “our policies prohibit customers from sending us data that could be used to identify a user.”

Tax data is strictly regulated by the IRS.
Between 2001 and 2019, Nina Olson, the executive director of the nonprofit Center for Taxpayer Rights, served as the Internal Revenue Service’s national taxpayer advocate, a position in the organization designed to represent the interests of taxpayers.

She helped draft the rules governing the disclosure of tax information as part of her responsibilities at the IRS. Olson stated that the IRS standards governing the use of data by private tax filing firms are “extremely stringent” on purpose.

According to the rules she helped create, tax preparers, including e-filing companies, are only permitted to use the information that taxpayers provide for certain limited purposes; anything beyond simply facilitating filing requires the user’s signed consent that specifies the recipient and the specific information being disclosed.

Even the font size of requests for disclosure is regulated by the government, which states that it must be “the same size as, or larger than, the typical or standard body text used by the website or software program.”

While Olson said she was not aware of any criminal cases that had been pursued, the penalty for sharing data without consent could be severe: fines and even jail time are possible.

The Markup searched the websites of tax preparation services for disclosures that expressly named Facebook or Meta, but it was unable to locate any. Some businesses, however, incorporated rather extensive disclosure agreements.

For instance, TaxAct asked customers to consent to the sibling firm, TaxSmart Research LLC, receiving their tax information so that it may “create, promote, and provide goods and services” for users. TaxSmart Research LLC may work with service providers and business partners to complete these responsibilities, it was further stated. In contrast, H&R Block included almost the same disclosure request so that “H&R Block Personalized Services, LLC” could offer its own products. Although users had the choice to opt out of sharing tax information with Facebook on certain sites, The Markup’s tests revealed that data was shared with Facebook regardless of the users’ choices.

According to Olson, any disclosure by a tax preparer must specify the precise objective and recipient in order to be in compliance. Do they have a list stating that they will reveal the return amounts, your children, and whatever else on Facebook? she questioned. If not, they might be breaking the law. Regarding whether any of the websites that shared tax information were in violation of the law, the IRS declined to comment or respond to any inquiries.

There is no escape for taxpayers
There aren’t many options available to American taxpayers outside using private businesses to file their taxes.

In contrast to other nations, the United States has a substantially privatized tax filing system that frequently necessitates the employment of outside tax preparers. In other nations, the taxpayers simply give their approval to the estimates that the government does. However, as a result of a successful lobbying campaign by private businesses, tax preparers in the US now serve as the official go-between for taxpayers and the government.

Today, tax preparation is a significant sector in the United States, worth more than $11 billion, according to market research.

Although there is a free preparation and filing alternative, it is only available to those making $73,000 or less and might be challenging to utilize. Companies are accused for not making the option easily accessible even when they provide their tax software at no cost as part of an agreement with the IRS.

The Markup discovered using the pixel that the IRS even successfully guides taxpayers attempting to file for free to some of the businesses. The Free File Alliance, an arrangement including a few tax preparation firms, includes TaxAct and TaxSlayer. H&R Block and TurboTax have previously participated in the program.

Harvard’s Matlock claimed that The Markup’s findings demonstrated the nearly unavoidable implications of entrusting a government requirement to for-profit businesses. According to her, the procedure leaves users with no alternative but to give their data to Facebook in order to comply with the law.

It’s aggravating, she added, since taxpayers are being forced into the hands of these private, for-profit businesses in order to fulfill their tax filing duties. “Really, we don’t have a choice in the issue.”

As Editor here at GeekReply, I'm a big fan of all things Geeky. Most of my contributions to the site are technology related, but I'm also a big fan of video games. My genres of choice include RPGs, MMOs, Grand Strategy, and Simulation. If I'm not chasing after the latest gear on my MMO of choice, I'm here at GeekReply reporting on the latest in Geek culture.

Artificial Intelligence

Boston Dynamics has retired its Atlas robot, showcasing its most impressive moments

blank

Published

on

blank

Boston Dynamics is discontinuing its hydraulic robot Atlas after years of pushing the limits. In order to bid adieu, the innovative firm has compiled a film montage showcasing the most remarkable instances of the mechanoid marvel, encompassing comical dancing routines, impressive acrobatic maneuvers, and a handful of unsuccessful attempts.

Atlas has been a source of inspiration for nearly ten years, igniting our creativity, motivating future generations of roboticists, and surpassing technical obstacles in the area. Boston Dynamics stated in a video aired on April 16 that it is now time for their hydraulic Atlas robot to rest and unwind.

“Please review all the achievements we have made so far with the Atlas platform,” they added.

Boston Dynamics, a robotics company based in Massachusetts, created Atlas for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Pentagon’s advanced technology division. Initially, it was conceived as a component of a prize competition with the aim of accelerating the progress of a humanoid robot capable of aiding in search and rescue missions.

Upon its public introduction in 2013, Atlas required a tether for stability and was limited to walking in a linear path. Almost.

A 1-year-old youngster has limited ability to walk and frequently stumbles. “As you observe these machines and draw comparisons to science fiction, it is important to bear in mind that this represents our current technological capabilities,” stated Gill Pratt, a program manager at DARPA who was involved in the design and funding of Atlas, in an interview with the New York Times in 2013.

Significant transformations have occurred since that time. The engineers at Boston Dynamics have meticulously tweaked the robot’s technology and algorithms throughout its development, enabling it to carry out physical tasks that would be difficult for most people with ease.

The most recent version of Atlas has a height of 150 cm, which is a little less than 5 feet, and a weight of 89 kilograms, equivalent to 196 pounds. With the help of its 28 hydraulic joints, this machine can achieve speeds of up to 2.5 meters (nearly 8 feet) per second. Additionally, it is capable of executing somersaults, athletic jumps, and 360° spins.

Additionally, it is equipped with a multitude of sensors that are utilized to accurately sense the immediate surroundings and respond accordingly in real-time. For example, if an obstacle is placed in the path of the robot, it will identify the issue and navigate around it. If you push it with a pole, it will elegantly adapt its body to stay upright.

Boston Dynamics has not provided an explanation for its decision to discontinue its renowned robot. Certain analysts have proposed that the corporation is preparing for the release of another novel product, but others have questioned whether Atlas has become a financial liability. While the company has successfully marketed its other inventions, such as the dog-like robot Spot, to different companies for diverse purposes, Atlas was never made available for sale.

According to IEEE Spectrum, Boston Dynamics has announced that they are retiring the hydraulic Atlas robot. Does this imply that a hydraulic Atlas robot is not the next item on the schedule? Currently, the outcome is uncertain and cannot be predicted.

It is uncertain what the future holds for the robots developed by Boston Dynamics, but we can only hope that it does not involve a rebellion by these machines.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

Boston Dynamics’ Atlas humanoid robot has transitioned to electric power

blank

Published

on

blank

Atlas is immobile, lying face down on a stack of connected gym mats. The only audio accompaniment is the humming of an electric motor. While it may not be completely silent, the noise level is significantly lower compared to the abrupt movements of its predecessors.

While the camera rotates, the robot’s legs flex at the knees. Initially, it is a spontaneous motion that gradually transitions into an eerie domain, reminiscent of scenes from a Sam Raimi film. The robot has successfully changed its position by cleverly rotating its legs, appearing as if it is lying on its back.

Atlas is positioned with its back facing the camera. Currently, the head rotates in a complete 180-degree motion, and subsequently, the torso mimics this movement. The object pauses briefly, allowing the camera to get a clear picture of its head—a circular screen with a ring-shaped light surrounding it. Once again, the torso rotates in alignment with the head’s 180-degree turn as Atlas moves away from the camera and exits the frame.

Boston Dynamics has recently announced that their humanoid robot, Atlas, has transitioned from a hydraulic system to an electric one, following in the footsteps of Bob Dylan.

The pace is rapid, with the steps still somewhat abrupt, although noticeably smoother than many of the recent commercial humanoids that have been introduced in the past few years. If anything, the gait evokes the bold self-assurance of Spot, a relative of Atlas who diverged from the humanoid lineage a few generations ago.

Brand new Atlas

The latest iteration of the robot is nearly indistinguishable. The top-heavy torso, bowed legs, and plated armor have been eliminated. There are no visible cables present on the sleek and slender new mechanical framework. The company, which has successfully defended against reactionary concerns about robopocalypse for many years, has chosen a more compassionate and considerate design compared to both the original Atlas and more modern robots such as the Figure 01 and Tesla Optimus.

The new robot’s appearance is more similar to that of Agility’s Digit and Apptronik’s Phoenix. The traffic-light-headed robot features a gentler and more whimsical design. According to the video, it is referred to as the “All New Atlas.” Boston Dynamics has deviated from its usual practice by retaining the research name for a product that it intends to market commercially. SpotMini was renamed Spot. The handle was transformed into a stretch. Currently, Atlas remains unchanged and is still referred to as Atlas.

“We may reconsider this when we are fully prepared to construct and distribute on a large scale,” states Boston Dynamics CEO Robert Playter in an interview with. “However, I believe that at present, it is beneficial to preserve the branding.”

The executive’s statement reveals the project is still in its initial phases. Boston Dynamics intends to start pilot testing of the electric Atlas at Hyundai facilities soon, with full-scale production following in a few years.

“Starting next year, we will be conducting on-site experiments with Hyundai,” states Playter. “We currently possess Hyundai equipment at our location.” We have been engaged in this task for a considerable period of time. In order to achieve success, it is imperative to possess a plethora of attributes beyond merely possessing innovative technology. In order to justify the investment in a robot, it is crucial to fully comprehend the use case and ensure that there is enough productivity to make it worthwhile.

Performing a complete reversal

blank

The most remarkable aspect of the 40-second “All New Atlas” teaser is the robot’s motions. They serve as a reminder that constructing a humanoid robot does not necessitate maximizing its human-like qualities. Despite billions of years of evolution, as one investor pointed out in the past, humans have not yet perfected themselves as machines. If we are going to design machines that resemble us, why not construct ones that possess capabilities beyond our own?

“We have constructed a collection of bespoke actuators that are powerful and adaptable, installed at the majority of joints,” states Playter. “The range of motion is extensive.” The compact design of this robot effectively harnesses the strength and agility of an exceptional athlete, allowing us to utilize its capabilities in various applications.

It is important to remember that Boston Dynamics has built its reputation through a series of popular videos over the course of many years. New additions to the canon are equally likely to feature a robot’s dance moves as they are to offer anything truly practical in an industrial environment. Therefore, it is challenging to separate the features that the company considers genuinely functional from those that are merely intended to impress.

Commencing in the prone position, for example, provides an opportunity to demonstrate the impressive reverse crab leg maneuver while also serving a practical purpose. Boston Dynamics proudly demonstrated in the farewell video of the hydraulic Atlas that falling down is an inherent aspect of its function, as is the ability to recover and stand up again. In reality, the majority of the current generation of industrial robots necessitates human intervention in the event of a failure. Conversely, a robot that can autonomously remove dust from its surface and resume its tasks is highly advantageous for enhancing productivity.

The system’s agility significantly enhances its potential for productivity. It reminds me of Agility’s Digit demonstrations (the company is notably the only one of its kind demonstrating systems at this magnitude), in which a robot walks to a shelf, rotates, walks to the conveyor belt, rotates again, and walks back. When you multiply that task by hundreds, or even thousands, per day, you start to realize the importance of saving valuable seconds.

“It will possess a range of movements that surpass human capabilities,” Playter explains. “There will be highly utilitarian applications for that.”

Minimizing the robot’s turning radius is crucial in confined areas. These machines are intended to be brownfield solutions, meaning they are specifically designed to be seamlessly integrated into pre-existing workflows within existing spaces. Enhanced maneuverability could ultimately determine whether one can effectively operate in a particular environment or if the layout needs to be redone.

Cranium and upper extremities

blank

The hands featured in the video are not newly created, as they have previously been used on the hydraulic model. However, they also signify the company’s choice to not strictly adhere to human design as a guiding principle. The distinction lies in the choice of using three fingers instead of four on the end effectors.

“A hand contains a great deal of intricacy,” states Playter. When using actuators to interact with the world, it is essential to anticipate and ensure both reliability and robustness. Therefore, we intentionally designed these objects with less than five fingers in order to manage and reduce their level of complexity. We are currently investigating various generations of individuals. We desire a grasping mechanism that adheres to regulations and is capable of adjusting to various shapes while possessing advanced sensing capabilities to accurately detect contact.

Internally, the head is likely the most controversial element of the design. The large, circular screen bears resemblance to a vanity mirror.

“It was a design element that we were greatly concerned about,” says Playter. “All the other individuals possessed a humanoid form.” I desired it to be distinct. We desire a welcoming and inclusive atmosphere. It offers a range of colors for a visual presentation. Undoubtedly, the object contains concealed sensors, but its design primarily aims to convey a sense of amicability. That knowledge will be crucial for effectively engaging with these entities in the future.

A Christmas Atlas

blank

The landscape has undergone significant changes in the past decade since the hydraulic Atlas was first introduced. There are several other companies, such as Figure, Apptronik, Tesla, and 1X, that also have humanoid robots like Electric Atlas.

There has been a significant increase in interest from our end. Three significant events, in my opinion, are what have caused the increase. Hyundai paid almost one billion dollars to acquire Boston Dynamics. That really caught everyone’s attention, making them realize there was a way out. Tesla’s expression of interest in manufacturing has confirmed the validity of our long-standing efforts. Furthermore, the rise of AI as a valuable tool in addressing general challenges is making all of this possible. We have taken our time to make this announcement, as we wanted to conduct thorough research to ensure that we can effectively address manipulation issues and have full confidence in our new generation of machines.

Despite Boston Dynamics’ significant advantage in the field of humanoids, Playter mentions that the company managed to assemble the initial version of the new robot around Christmas 2023. Prior to that, it was addressing numerous intricate issues in simulation.

This week, it appears that the company is prepared to showcase the capabilities of the robot, or at least provide a glimpse into its initial plans for the system.

Intelligence in a broad sense
One thing that can be said about Elon Musk is that he consistently makes ambitious commitments. During the initial stages of Optimus’ public debut, when the Tesla ‘bot seemed to resemble a human in spandex, the executive discussed a comprehensive system capable of performing various tasks. Imagine having an Optimus that can handle your factory work, run errands, and even prepare a delicious dinner for you. That’s the aspiration, isn’t it?

The reality is, of course, one that is built upon taking small steps forward. Robotics companies are currently engaged in discussions about “general-purpose humanoids,” but their systems are currently focused on scaling one task at a time. For many individuals, the primary objective is to transport payloads from one location to another. To fully leverage the form factor, a broader level of intelligence will be necessary.

The app store model seems to offer the most straightforward solution. Developer access has indeed played a significant role in expanding Spot’s range of features. According to Playter, Boston Dynamics has a different approach in mind for Atlas.

“We will focus on developing an application rather than creating a platform,” he states. In our experience, the key to making progress quickly is to prioritize a specific application and actively work towards solving any challenges that arise. We cannot rely on others to solve these problems for us. I believe that AI is a crucial component in this context. To ensure the efficiency of tasks, they will be enhanced with AI techniques.

Developers now have access to Spot’s reinforcement learning algorithm, thanks to the company’s recent decision. This work will be crucial for Atlas’ expanding skillset.

Thinking creatively

In order to achieve success, Playter emphasizes the importance of thinking outside the box.

“I believe there are numerous other robots capable of accomplishing that,” he remarks. Humanoids should be capable of handling a wide range of tasks. You have two hands. As a business owner, you need to be able to handle intricate and heavy geometric shapes that a basic box picker wouldn’t be able to manage. And you have to handle a massive volume of these shapes, numbering in the hundreds of thousands. I believe the era of the single-task robot is long gone. Stretch is a unique application where a robot can efficiently navigate and handle boxes.

What other responsibilities will the new Atlas have on the Hyundai show floor, similar to those of a business owner? The company shared a video in February that contains the solution. The video shows the hydraulic version of the robot interacting with the Hyundai parts that Playter previously mentioned.

“With our extensive experience in the field of dynamic mobility, we possess the strength and expertise to handle substantial payloads while ensuring exceptional mobility,” he explains. Being able to handle heavy, complex, and massive objects will set us apart from the competition. The strut in the video likely weighs around 25 pounds. Acquiring wheels: we will be releasing a video later on as part of our comprehensive initiative, showcasing the various manipulation tasks we have been conducting with Atlas using real-world objects. I’m quite certain we have a good grasp on how to handle that aspect, and I haven’t observed anyone else attempting it thus far.

Continue Reading

Artificial Intelligence

Elon Musk intends to impose a fee on new X members in order to grant them the ability to make posts

blank

Published

on

blank

Elon Musk intends to impose a small fee on new X members to grant them the ability to make posts on the social network and to address the issue of automated accounts.

Musk responded to an X account that had mentioned modifications on X’s website by stating that imposing a little cost on new accounts was the sole method to prevent the overwhelming influx of automated programs, known as bots.

“The current state of artificial intelligence, including troll farms, can easily pass the ‘are you a bot’ test,” Musk stated, alluding to techniques such as CAPTCHA.

In response to another user, Musk then stated that newly created accounts would have the ability to post without incurring a fee after a period of three months.

Currently, there is a lack of information regarding the timeline for implementing this policy and the potential charges that may be imposed on new members, which is consistent with the pattern of limited disclosure often seen in announcements pertaining to the social network.

In October of last year, X implemented a policy of charging new members who have not been verified a fee of $1 per year in both New Zealand and the Philippines. Users that register for the site from these regions will have the ability to view the posts, but they will not be able to engage with them. In order to publish, endorse, share, respond to, save, and cite posts, a monetary charge was required. Musk may implement a charge that is comparable to fees in other areas.

In a recent announcement, X stated that the platform would be initiating a significant elimination of spam accounts. Users were cautioned that their follower count could be impacted. Nevertheless, by implementing a strategy to impose fees on new members, the social media corporation appears to be striving to address the issue of bots more effectively.

Although Musk has expressed concerns about AI bots, X recently updated its policy to state that public posts may be utilized for training machine learning algorithms or artificial intelligence models. In July 2023, Musk mentioned that his AI company, xAI, would utilize public posts for training models.

In recent weeks, xAI has introduced its Grok chatbot to premium users of X, who are charged a monthly fee of $8. The chatbot was previously accessible to users who subscribed to the Premium+ tier for $16 per month. Last week, Fortune reported that X intends to offer Grok to users for composing posts.

Continue Reading

Trending