Engineering
What You Need to Know About Onshore Wind Farms
Within days of winning the election, Britain’s new Labour government lifted a rule that had stopped new onshore wind farms from being built. The previous Conservative government had implemented the rule in 2015. Environmentalists have praised the decision as a positive first step in the new government’s fight against climate change. However, people who are wary of onshore wind farms will probably be worried about them. What is the difference between power that comes from the land and power that comes from the sea? Why have people been against it?
How do wind farms work?
People have tried to use the power of the wind for their own purposes for a long time. It’s a great way to gain energy, but it can be hard to master. One of the newest examples of this is modern wind turbines. Using the wind’s motion to make electricity is how they work.
The blades of a wind turbine are made to look like airplane wings and are strong and light. They are connected to a hub and make up a rotor as a whole. This part of the machine spins when air moves across the blades. It also turns something called a low-speed shaft. The shaft is also linked to a gearbox that changes the shaft’s slow spin motion into a fast rotary motion. Next, this turns a drive shaft that gives power to an electric generator.
What is wind energy on land?
In terms of technology, there is no difference between wind turbines that are on land and those that are at sea. The only clear difference is where they are.
Onshore wind farms are groups of wind turbines that are put up in rural areas where the wind blows steadily and strongly. Open plains, the coast, hills, and mountain passes are often good places for them to live. Offshore wind farms are the same as onshore ones; the only difference is that they are out at sea and get their power from the wind that blows across the water.
Each turbine is placed so that it captures the most wind and doesn’t cause turbulence on another turbine when they are all put together. Because of the different types of terrain, there aren’t any set patterns for how they should be laid out, but there are some that are thought to be the best. Depending on the situation, they can be put in either a straight line or a grid.
No matter how they are set up, each turbine makes electricity that is sent to a substation and then to the grid, where homeowners and businesses can use it.
What are the pros and cons of wind farms that are built on land?
It is well known that wind farms that are farther out to sea tend to work better. This is because the wind speed at sea is higher and more consistent, so fewer turbines are needed to make the same amount of energy as ones on land. Larger projects can also be done because the sea is open. The more turbines you have, the more clean energy you make.
Offshore wind farms need more complicated infrastructure to support them, which makes them more expensive to build and keep up. But the same things that make them great for making electricity also make them hard to get to when they need to be fixed. They are also usually owned by bigger companies rather than smaller ones in the area, which means that they are not closely watched by people in the area.
Onshore wind farms, on the other hand, are easier to build and produce less pollution, and the land around them can still be used for farming. Building and maintaining them doesn’t cost much, and the extra power they add to the grid can lower your electricity bills. On the other hand, large-scale construction projects also create more skilled jobs in the energy sector.
But onshore wind farms don’t produce as much power as offshore ones, and a lot of people don’t like the way they look or how they affect the environment. The first one has to do with the worry that these buildings are dangerous for birds and bats.
In the scientific community, there is still disagreement about how strong this is. It looks like some birds are killed by wind turbines, but not nearly as many as are killed each year by housecats, other buildings, or even fossil fuel operations, which are what wind farms are trying to replace.
Concerns have also been raised about bats, and environmentalists are divided on the issue. On the one hand, they want clean energy to help fight climate change, but they also don’t want to put at risk the lives of animals that are already in danger of going extinct.
Onshore wind farms can be built in a way that doesn’t harm the wildlife nearby, though. After ten years of work, designers of wind turbines have found ways to make them visible to animals. On the other hand, wind farms don’t have to be built in places where bats are nesting or swarming.
But this is just one answer. Bats are drawn to wind turbines, which have often killed them while they were looking for places to nest or insects. To stop this from happening, the times and conditions under which wind turbines are used can be changed to fit how bats behave.
When the wind speed is above a certain level, many of the bat species that are most vulnerable to wind turbines cannot fly. This is because they are small, fluffy, and cute. It is possible to drastically lower the number of bat deaths by only using turbines when the wind speed is low.
But the most common reason people give for not supporting wind power is that it looks bad. People worry that putting up wind farms in rural areas will ruin the beauty of the land and make it look less “natural.”
This objection is not only shortsighted when you think about how bad climate change will be for future generations if nothing is done to stop it, but it also comes up a lot. People used to be against windmills for the same reasons, and now they are seen as iconic symbols of the same rural feelings that make people against wind turbines today.
For these new energy-generating structures to be aesthetically pleasing in the long term, people in the area need to start seeing them as part of the landscape instead of just money-making assets owned by corporations.
Artificial Intelligence
Google DeepMind Shows Off A Robot That Plays Table Tennis At A Fun “Solidly Amateur” Level
Have you ever wanted to play table tennis but didn’t have anyone to play with? We have a big scientific discovery for you! Google DeepMind just showed off a robot that could give you a run for your money in a game. But don’t think you’d be beaten badly—the engineers say their robot plays at a “solidly amateur” level.
From scary faces to robo-snails that work together to Atlas, who is now retired and happy, it seems like we’re always just one step away from another amazing robotics achievement. But people can still do a lot of things that robots haven’t come close to.
In terms of speed and performance in physical tasks, engineers are still trying to make machines that can be like humans. With the creation of their table-tennis-playing robot, a team at DeepMind has taken a step toward that goal.
What the team says in their new preprint, which hasn’t been published yet in a peer-reviewed journal, is that competitive matches are often incredibly dynamic, with complicated movements, quick eye-hand coordination, and high-level strategies that change based on the opponent’s strengths and weaknesses. Pure strategy games like chess, which robots are already good at (though with… mixed results), don’t have these features. Games like table tennis do.
People who play games spend years practicing to get better. The DeepMind team wanted to make a robot that could really compete with a human opponent and make the game fun for both of them. They say that their robot is the first to reach these goals.
They came up with a library of “low-level skills” and a “high-level controller” that picks the best skill for each situation. As the team explained in their announcement of their new idea, the skill library has a number of different table tennis techniques, such as forehand and backhand serves. The controller uses descriptions of these skills along with information about how the game is going and its opponent’s skill level to choose the best skill that it can physically do.
The robot began with some information about people. It was then taught through simulations that helped it learn new skills through reinforcement learning. It continued to learn and change by playing against people. Watch the video below to see for yourself what happened.
“It’s really cool to see the robot play against players of all skill levels and styles.” Our goal was for the robot to be at an intermediate level when we started. “It really did that, all of our hard work paid off,” said Barney J. Reed, a professional table tennis coach who helped with the project. “I think the robot was even better than I thought it would be.”
The team held competitions where the robot competed against 29 people whose skills ranged from beginner to advanced+. The matches were played according to normal rules, with one important exception: the robot could not physically serve the ball.
The robot won every game it played against beginners, but it lost every game it played against advanced and advanced+ players. It won 55% of the time against opponents at an intermediate level, which led the team to believe it had reached an intermediate level of human skill.
The important thing is that all of the opponents, no matter how good they were, thought the matches were “fun” and “engaging.” They even had fun taking advantage of the robot’s flaws. The more skilled players thought that this kind of system could be better than a ball thrower as a way to train.
There probably won’t be a robot team in the Olympics any time soon, but it could be used as a training tool. Who knows what will happen in the future?
The preprint has been put on arXiv.
Engineering
New concrete that doesn’t need cement could cut carbon emissions in the construction industry
Even though concrete is a very common building material, it is not at all the most environmentally friendly choice. Because of this, scientists and engineers have been looking for alternatives that are better for the environment. They may have found one: concrete that doesn’t need cement.
Cement production, which is a crucial ingredient in concrete, ranks as the third most significant contributor to human-caused carbon emissions globally. Nevertheless, in recent years, a multitude of alternative techniques for producing more environmentally friendly concrete have surfaced. One proposed method involves utilizing industrial waste and steel slag as CO2-reducing additives in the concrete mixture. Another suggestion is to utilize spent coffee grounds to enhance the strength of the concrete while reducing the amount of sand required.
However, a certain company has devised a technique to produce cement-free concrete suitable for commercial enterprises.
The concrete has the potential to have a net reduction in carbon dioxide and has the ability to prevent approximately 1 metric ton of carbon emissions for every metric ton used. If this statement is accurate, the cement-free binder will serve as a noteworthy substitute for Portland cement. According to BGR, the new concrete also complies with all the industry standards of traditional cement concrete, ensuring that there is no compromise in terms of strength and durability.
While it is still in the early stages, the situation seems encouraging. C-Crete Technologies, a company specializing in materials science and holding the patents for a novel form of concrete, has utilized approximately 140 tons of this new cast-in-place (pourable) concrete in recent construction endeavors.
In September 2023, the company was granted an initial sum of almost $1 million, promptly succeeded by an additional $2 million, by the US Department of Energy to advance the progress of its technology. In addition, it has garnered numerous accolades that are facilitating its growth in operations.
The widespread adoption of cement-free concrete in future construction projects has the potential to significantly alter the environmental impact of the industry. Although C-Crete seems to be one of the few companies currently exploring these new alternatives on a large scale, it is likely that others will also start embracing them in the near future.
Engineering
To get gold back from electronic waste, the Royal Mint of the UK is using a new method
There are hidden mountains of gold in the junkyards, full of old smartphones, computers that don’t work anymore, and broken laptops. A new project in the UK wants to find and use these hidden riches.
The Royal Mint, which makes British coins for the government, has agreed to work with the Canadian clean tech startup Excir to use a “world-first technology” that can safely get gold and other precious metals out of electronic waste (e-waste) and recycle them.
Electronic devices have circuit boards that have small amounts of gold in their connections because gold is a good conductor. These boards also have useful metals like silver, copper, lead, nickel, and aluminum.
In the past, getting the metals was hard, but Excir’s new technology can quickly and safely recover 99 percent of the gold that is trapped in electronic waste.
They prepare the circuit boards using a “unique process,” and then they use a patented chemical formula to quickly and selectively remove the gold. The liquid that is high in gold is then processed to make pure gold that can be melted down and formed into bars. Palladium, silver, and copper could also be recovered with this method.
“Our entrepreneurial spirit has helped the Royal Mint do well for over 1,100 years, and the Excir technology helps us reach our goal of being a leader in sustainable precious metals.” The chemistry is completely new and can get precious metals back from electronics in seconds. “It has a lot of potential for The Royal Mint and the circular economy, as it helps to reuse our planet’s valuable resources and creates new jobs in the UK,” said Sean Millard, Chief Growth Officer at The Royal Mint.
At the moment, about 22% of electronic waste is collected, stored properly, and recycled. But with this kind of new technology, the problem of old electronics could be lessened.
Every year, the world makes about 62 million metric tons of electronic waste, which is more than 1.5 million 40-tonne trucks’ worth. That number will go up by another 32% by 2030 as more people buy electronics. This will make it the fastest-growing source of solid waste in the world.
The World Health Organization says that e-waste is hazardous waste because it contains harmful materials and can leak harmful chemicals if it is not handled properly. For example, old electronics can release lead and mercury into the environment, which can affect the development of the central nervous system while a person is pregnant, as a baby, as a child, or as a teen. Also, e-waste doesn’t break down naturally and builds up in nature.
Aside from being a huge waste, this is also a big problem for the environment. There could be between $57 billion and $62 billion worth of precious metals in dumps and scrap yards.
- Gadgets9 years ago
Why the Nexus 7 is still a good tablet in 2015
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs Galaxy Note 5: is there room for improvement?
- Editorials9 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 – How bad updates prevent people from enjoying their phones
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 5 2015 and Android M born to be together
- Gaming9 years ago
New Teaser For Five Nights At Freddy’s 4
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Google not releasing Android M to Nexus 7
- Gadgets10 years ago
Moto G Android 5.0.2 Lollipop still has a memory leak bug
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 7 2015: Huawei and Google changing the game