Geology
Why We Still Can’t Predict Earthquakes – and We Probably Never Will
Every few years or so, the world has to deal with one catastrophic earthquake, which, especially when it hits somewhere in the developing world, can result in massive loss of life and property. The most recent one was in Nepal, where the latest death has exceeded 5,000. What makes these earthquakes even more terrifying is the fact, even though we understand them pretty well and our data gathering and computational capabilities have increased a lot over the years, scientist still have basically no way of knowing exactly when the next big one will occur. So what makes earthquakes so difficult to predict?
First of all, we have to understand what causes an earthquake. Our planet’s crust, the relatively thin outermost layer of our planet which floats on top of the semi-molten mantle, is divided into several huge slabs of rock called tectonic plates, like the cracked shell of a boiled egg. These plates aren’t static – powerful currents within the mantle slowly move them around, at a rate of a few millimeters or centimeters per year. Huge tensions build up in the places where they meet (called plate boundaries) because as the plates move, the boundaries themselves stick, due to friction. Eventually, the rocks snap (or slip), and all that tension is released as seismic waves – this is what’s called the stick-slip process, and it’s what causes earthquakes.
Over the years, as our understanding of this phenomenon got better, we’ve been getting better at forecasting (not predicting!) earthquakes. It all started with recognizing that earthquakes are caused by faulting, the movement of rock along a break in the surface (a fault), and not, as previously thought, the other way around – the cracks in the earth were just a result of the earthquake. Today we know that most seismic events happen where tectonic plates collide head-on or slide along one another, which tells us where to expect them and where we should better prepare.
There are other things seismologists can do to try to actually determine when the next big one will happen. They can use historical and geological records to determine the intensity and frequency of past earthquakes. Also, they can improve the current models of what happens along the plates and roughly estimate the time and place where a big earthquake might occur. Once again, we’re talking about a forecast – scientists are basically saying an earthquake will occur sometime in the next couple of decades. And it’s highly unlikely they’ll ever be able to do better.
That’s because those earthquake-generating tectonic plates are huge, 100 km thick on average, and tremendously heavy. In order to predict when an earthquake will happen, you’d have to know precisely the weight, speed, and direction in which these massive slabs of rock are moving; you’d have to understand the underlying mechanism which makes them move; and you’d have to exactly what kind of rocks are they made of and what are their properties, so you know how much force is needed to break them. Also, keep in mind earthquakes happen dozens or hundreds of kilometers below the surface, so you’d need to gather all this data from extremely deep underground. It’s highly unlikely we’ll ever be able to do all of this.
While we can’t predict earthquakes in time to actually organize an evacuation or take other measures which require adequate advance warning, we could do other things to mitigate the damage. First of all, there are a number of simple things each and every one of us can do to make sure we are prepared in case of a disaster. Things like securing furniture or knowing where to take cover when the ground starts to shake (here’s a link with some of these tips, or watch the video below).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXxPTAhMGLI
But perhaps the best thing we could do in order to reduce damage from seismic events would be to build earthquake-proof structures. Engineers in Japan and California have come up with intriguing ideas to reinforce buildings, making them better suited to withstand a powerful shock. And there are plenty of low-tech ways to improve houses in the developing world as well.
Probably the only thing we can tell for sure about future big earthquake is that we’ll never be able to tell exactly when it will hit. Nevertheless, seismologists do know where earthquakes are most likely to occur, and could maybe even set a time frame for the event. Knowing which places are at risk is a valuable piece of information in and of itself, and could be used to put in place various measures, thus greatly limiting the damage done by these natural disasters.
Biology
A new study shows that the Atlantic Gulf Stream was surprisingly strong during the last ice age
The world was stuck in a big ice age 20,000 years ago. Ice sheets that were two miles thick covered a large portion of North America, Scandinavia, and the British Isles.
Greenhouse gas levels were much lower, it was 6 °C colder, and the sea level was at least 120 meters lower because of all the water trapped in ice sheets. This made the land that is now underwater visible. From France to London, you could have walked through Doggerland. From Russia to Alaska, you could have walked through Beringia.
But our study, which is now out in Nature, has found at least one surprising thing about the climate during the ice age: the Gulf Stream, which moves warm water north through the Atlantic, was stronger and deeper than it is now.
As paleoceanographers (scientists who study the past of the oceans), we wanted to find out how the oceans behaved during the last ice age to get a sense of how climate change might change things in the future.
Water that is warm, from Mexico to Norway
As part of the Gulf Stream, warm, salty water from the Gulf of Mexico flows north today. It keeps the weather in western Europe very mild because a part of it flows through Europe and gives off a lot of heat.
Then, when the surface water goes north of Iceland, it loses enough heat to make it denser, which makes it sink and form deepwater. At depths greater than a mile below the surface, this process starts the global deepwater conveyor belt, which links all of the world’s oceans and moves heat slowly around the planet.
Scientists used to think that the Gulf Stream and other deep and surface ocean currents in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation were weaker during very cold times, like the last ice age. More sea ice in the Arctic should have cut down on the amount of water sinking from the surface to the deep ocean, which would have slowed down the global deepwater conveyor belt.
Our new study, on the other hand, shows that the Gulf Stream was much stronger and deeper during the last ice age. Even though it is cold because of glaciers and there are huge ice sheets around the northern parts of the Atlantic, this is still the case.
According to our research, the climate during the glaciers may have made the Gulf Stream stronger. During the ice age, winds were much stronger in some parts of the North Atlantic. This would have made the Gulf Stream stronger. So, even though less water was sinking from the surface to the deep ocean, the Gulf Stream was stronger and still carried a lot of heat north, though not as far as it does now.
Putting together how the oceans moved in the past
So we could not use data from weather buoys or satellites to figure out how the ocean would have moved during the last ice age. Instead, we used marine sediment cores, which are long tubes of mud from the ocean floor, as a substitute.
The cores we used were made of mud that had been building up on the seafloor for 25,000 years. They were collected from different spots along the east coast of the US by research vessels from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, where some of our team is based.
We looked at the size of the sediment grains in the mud to figure out how strong the Gulf Stream was during the ice age. Bigger grains meant faster flow, and smaller grains meant slower flow.
We also looked at the shell chemistry of foraminifera, which are tiny organisms with only one cell. We found the line between foraminifera that used to live in warm subtropical waters and those that used to live in colder subpolar waters by comparing data from a range of depths at different sites in the Northwest Atlantic. We were able to figure out how deep the Gulf Stream was when those organisms were alive.
This makes climate predictions less certain
According to our study, changes in wind speed and the melting of the Greenland ice sheet have an impact on the Gulf Stream and the larger network of Atlantic currents. This is a big deal for climate change in the future.
Climate models say that the Gulf Stream will get weaker in the 21st century, partly because there will be less wind. This would make the sea level rise even more along the east coast of the US and make Europe warmer than the rest of the world. If climate change changes the way winds blow in the future, the Gulf Stream will also change. This makes it harder to predict what the weather will be like in the future.
Also, our results show that we shouldn’t say simple things about Atlantic currents and how the climate will change in the future. There are many currents in the Atlantic, and each one has its own behavior and way of reacting to climate change. So, when we talk about how human-caused climate change affects the climate system, we need to be very clear about which part we’re talking about and what that means for different countries.Talking About It
David Thornalley is a professor of ocean and climate science at UCL, and Mark Maslin is a professor of natural sciences there. Jack Wharton is a postdoctoral research fellow in paleoceanography.
This article was taken from The Conversation and shared with a Creative Commons license. Read the first article.
Environment
What’s Under the Ice in Antarctica? A long-lost land with very different terrain
South America is covered in a layer of ice that is about 2.2 kilometers (1.4 miles) thick. A continental landmass with rocky mountains, volcanoes, and sizable canyons that humans have carved out over millions of years is beneath this ice. This is different from the Arctic in the Northern Hemisphere.
There are decades’ worth of satellite data and radar surveys that have made it possible to see the “lumps and bumps” of the long-lost bedrock.
It is one of the most complete maps of Antarctica, which is the world’s southernmost continental landmass.
The project was a huge undertaking that involved 19 research organizations from around the world, such as NASA, the National Science Foundation, the University of California Irvine, the British Antarctic Survey, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Australian government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program, and many more. It was published in 2019.
The map is interesting to look at, like using X-ray glasses to see inside a continent covered in ice. But it could also be used in science. Researchers can use the map’s data to learn a lot about Antarctica’s geographical mysteries, such as the continent’s shape and the future of its unstable ice sheets.
The canyon below the Denman Glacier was much bigger than I thought it would be from the map. Denman Trough, which is full of ice, is the deepest place on continental Earth. It is 3,500 meters (11,500 feet) below sea level.
“Older maps showed a canyon that was shallower, but that wasn’t possible; something was missing.” We know how much ice flows through the canyon because of the principle of conservation of mass. Based on our calculations, the canyon is 3,500 meters below sea level, making it the deepest place on land. In 2019, Mathieu Morlighem, an associate professor of Earth system science at the University of California, Irvine, said, “Because it’s not very wide, it has to be deep for that much ice mass to reach the coast.”
Ice has been covering most of Antarctica for millions and millions of years, covering more than 97% of the continent. There are almost 4.9 kilometers (3 miles) of ice at its thickest point, which is the height of six Burj Khalifas stacked on top of each other.
The land is very harsh, though, and ice is only one part of it. One less well-known fact about Antarctica is that it often erupts in volcanoes. In 2017, one study found 138 volcanoes in West Antarctica alone. Eight or nine of the volcanoes in Antarctica are thought to be active, even though most of them are not active. Mount Erebus is one of the most dangerous volcanoes in Antarctica. It is the southernmost active volcano on Earth and the tallest active volcano in Antarctica, with a peak that is 3,794 meters (12,448 feet) high.
It’s simple to picture Antarctica as a cold and, dare we say it, dull ice cube at the Earth’s core. But if you look more closely, you’ll see that it’s a world that is always changing and is full of secrets and strange stories.
Environment
Hurricane Beryl sets a new record for the season’s first hurricane, and officials warn of danger
Beryl is the first named hurricane of the Atlantic season this year. It has already made history before it even got to the Caribbean this morning, and officials say it looks like it will keep doing so.
When does the Atlantic hurricane season start? It starts on June 1 and ends on November 30. The first named hurricane usually happens in early to mid-August, and the first major hurricane (Category 3 or higher) usually happens between late August and early September.
Hurricane Beryl has already gone against the flow twice. A tropical storm gave it its start in late June, on Friday, the 28th. Second, it quickly became a major hurricane. On Sunday, its strong winds made it a Category 4 storm, making it the earliest storm of that strength to ever form in the Atlantic.
An advisory from the National Hurricane Center this morning said that Beryl will still be an “extremely dangerous” hurricane when it hits land in the Caribbean, even though it has weakened back down to Category 3.
“Hurricane-force winds, a life-threatening storm surge, and damaging waves could be very bad when Beryl goes over parts of the Windward Islands. St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Grenada will have the highest risk of the core starting later this morning,” the center said.
The storm’s strongest sustained winds are now estimated to be around 195 kilometers per hour (120 miles per hour). Winds that are that strong can uproot trees and do a lot of damage to even well-built homes.
The National Hurricane Center also said that the storm surge could raise water levels up to 1.8 to 2.7 meters (6 to 9 feet) above normal tide levels. This would bring “large and destructive” waves to coastal areas.
With 7.6 to 15.2 centimeters (3 to 6 inches) of possible rain, it’s easy to see why people in the Caribbean islands that will be hit by the hurricane first are being told to get ready as much as they can.
If your home is unsafe or could suffer damage from flooding or wind, stay put or move to a safe place. Food, water, and medicine should be kept safe for at least seven days in containers that won’t leak. Drains outside should be clear, and any loose items should be safely in place by now. “Put sandbags by all of your home’s doors,” the Trinidad and Tobago Meteorological Service warned early Monday morning.
It’s going to stay a “powerful hurricane” even after Beryl moves across the Caribbean Sea and over those first islands.
The damage from this hurricane is already clear, but it might not be the only one this year. The National Weather Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said in May that the 2024 hurricane season would be “extraordinary,” with four to seven major hurricanes possible.
- Gadgets9 years ago
Why the Nexus 7 is still a good tablet in 2015
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs Galaxy Note 5: is there room for improvement?
- Editorials9 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 – How bad updates prevent people from enjoying their phones
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 5 2015 and Android M born to be together
- Gaming9 years ago
New Teaser For Five Nights At Freddy’s 4
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Google not releasing Android M to Nexus 7
- Gadgets10 years ago
Moto G Android 5.0.2 Lollipop still has a memory leak bug
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 7 2015: Huawei and Google changing the game