Connect with us

Engineering

The Space Force is considering refueling options while the sector is requesting cash and standards

Published

on

In April 2007, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency showcased the capability to refuel a satellite in orbit by outfitting a spacecraft with a robotic arm, connecting it to another spacecraft, and transferring around 32 pounds of hydrazine into its fuel tank.

Fred Kennedy, who oversaw the project for DARPA, stated that the mission, called Orbital Express, achieved several technological milestones.

The U.S. mission not only highlighted the first-ever in-space refueling operation but also demonstrated the capability to employ tracking and imaging sensors to attach to a receiving satellite and do maintenance tasks like replacing a battery or flight computer.

Kennedy emphasized that autonomy was the key aspect during an interview with C4ISRNET on February 27. “We demonstrated an efficient method to approach a spacecraft closely and provide a range of servicing capabilities.”

Four months after its launch, the Air Force and NASA, DARPA’s mission partners, terminated the program.

The project lacked a clear mission application and was planned to support a space-based radar program that was terminated before Orbital Express began.

DARPA is accustomed to outcomes that are not surprising, as their projects frequently delve into cutting-edge technologies. Kennedy stated that he and his team stopped working on the project, expecting that the refueling and service concepts they showcased would reappear as agencies recognized their significance.

Kennedy stated that all of them believed there might be a brief pause. “No one anticipated that it would require 18 years to truly begin seeing the benefits of those accomplishments.”

According to a request from U.S. Space Command authorities to complete by the end of the decade, the Space Force is currently looking into the military benefits of including refueling capabilities in future space domain awareness satellites.

In 2020, the Space Force recognized servicing, mobility, and logistics as fundamental skills. The service has developed comprehensive requirements for the mission area. It formed a program office last year to coordinate development efforts and collaborate with companies to show refueling capabilities.

According to a request from U.S. Space Command authorities, the Space Force is currently looking into the military advantages of including refillable tanks on upcoming space domain awareness satellites before the end of the decade.

In 2020, the Space Force selected servicing, mobility, and logistics as essential skills. The service has developed comprehensive requirements for the mission area. It established a specialized program office last year to coordinate short- and long-term development initiatives and collaborate with enterprises to showcase refueling capabilities.

Current and former government and industry officials suggest that, due to pioneering flights like Orbital Express and initiatives from the commercial sector, the current difficulty is not primarily technological as momentum grows towards implementing these concepts. The Space Force’s objective is to establish a clear vision for the military’s use of on-orbit servicing and to play a role in funding and setting the standards that will influence the market in the short term.

Kennedy, the current leader of Dark Fission Space Systems, believes that the success of the company’s goal to advance nuclear thermal propulsion will rely heavily on the Space Force following through on its promises with tangible actions.

He stated that although words are pleasant, it is imperative that we start moving promptly. “I believe we have already waited 18 years excessively.”

Dynamic spatial operations
On-orbit servicing encompasses many capabilities designed to prolong a satellite’s lifespan or alter its mission performance. That may encompass refueling, maintenance, improvements, or supplying an additional propulsion source.

The Space Force began to focus more on on-orbit servicing a few years ago, but a significant shift occurred in 2022 when Space Command acknowledged that the satellites used to monitor the space environment were constrained by low fuel levels.

The purpose of the Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program satellites is to act as a surveillance system in geosynchronous orbit, approximately 22,000 miles above Earth. The GSSAP satellites conduct rendezvous and proximity operations to approach and observe other spacecraft, especially those belonging to U.S. adversaries, in order to gather data on them.

Satellites, like other military space assets, were launched with a finite amount of fuel, which usually determines their operational lifespan. Lt. Gen. John Shaw, the former deputy chief of Space Command, noted that the limitation of not needing to maneuver may be suitable for a GPS or communication satellite, but it hinders the Space Force’s utilization of GSSAP and other space domain awareness systems.

Shaw informed C4ISRNET that Space Command was instructing GSSAP operators to focus on observing specific objects, use various maneuvers to increase stealth, and prevent the owners of those assets from detecting their approach.

Shaw says that the operators pushed back, saying that the satellites didn’t have enough fuel to make those moves and still be useful until the end of their useful lives.

That answer worried him. Understanding threats in space depends on being aware of the space domain, but these satellites’ limitations made it hard for them to do their job easily.

“I asked myself, ‘How much is this limiting us?'” “How did we get to this point where we’ve learned to be helpless and give up on going after certain targets?” Shaw asked. Shaw retired from Space Command in October 2023 and was named to Sierra Space’s strategic council group in February. “It was pretty important when we started to peel it back.”

As he shared his findings with others in Space Command, Shaw noted that the concerns began to escalate, evolving into a concept he refers to as dynamic space operations. The updated operational approach includes satellites that are more agile and can move more easily to examine the space environment or evade hostile threats or debris.

The concept of dynamic space operations relies on the presence of maintenance, mobility, and logistics technologies, such as refueling. Last year, Space Command urged the Space Force to promptly establish these capabilities.

The military responded quickly. The new procurement office, under the leadership of Col. Joyce Bulson, has been organizing tabletop exercises and preparing demonstrations to enhance the Space Force’s ability to satisfy operators’ current and future needs.

Bulson recently informed reporters that the Space Force is exploring the use of commercial technologies and capabilities being developed by NASA and DARPA in the mobility and logistics sectors.

DARPA is collaborating with SpaceLogistics, a division of Northrop Grumman, to develop a spacecraft for satellite repairs and upgrades under its Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites program.

NASA, in collaboration with Maxar Technologies, was creating an on-orbit servicing and manufacturing vehicle specifically for satellite repairs. The agency terminated the $2 billion program on March 1 because of exceeding costs and delays.

Bulson stated during a media briefing on January 31 at the Space Mobility Conference in Orlando, Florida, that the technologies and concepts being discussed are built upon existing initiatives by others. “We are not attempting to replicate the current efforts.”

Rigorous analysis
The Space Force is considering conducting refueling demonstrations in the coming years to influence its future strategies. Astroscale U.S. was awarded a $25.5 million contract in September last year by the service to create a refueling spacecraft. The objective is to refuel a satellite using a vehicle in a test scheduled for 2026.

The service is collaborating with the Defense Innovation Unit, the Pentagon’s commercial technology hub, as part of its initiative. Orbit Fab, a Colorado-based company, will construct a fuel depot for Impulse Space’s orbiting servicing spacecraft, Mira. The depot will refill Astroscale’s vehicle using Orbit Fab’s Rapidly Attachable Fluid Transfer Interface, which transfers gas into the spacecraft. The system will also assist in a demonstration by the Air Force Research Laboratory known as Tetra-5.

In addition to refueling, the Space Force is exploring alternative technologies for providing satellites with extra propulsion, such as jetpacks that can be attached to spacecraft running low on fuel.

The acquisition team is planning refueling demonstrations, and the service is conducting further studies to enhance its understanding of how this capability will impact its involvement in future battles. A new Space Futures Command, focused on enhancing the service’s analytical precision, is expected to prioritize satellite refueling as one of its initial emerging mission objectives.

Doug Loverro, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for space strategy and current independent consultant, emphasized the importance of the Space Force analyzing potential scenarios for refueling before implementing a formal program.

“There is much discussion, but there is a lack of analysis demonstrating the feasibility,” he stated. “A comprehensive analysis has not been conducted to determine the specific operational stage where this would be effective, the necessary requirements, and related details.”

Kennedy observed that Space Command has emphasized the necessity of a refueling capacity for its space domain awareness systems, suggesting that the service should also explore how other satellites and missions could leverage mobility and logistical capabilities. That includes transfer vehicles, which are specifically created to transport spacecraft to various orbits.

“If your only request is for GSSAP to have an extended duration,” he stated, “that does not align with the concept of dynamic space operations.”

Access and the resulting repercussions are crucial factors in achieving success by reaching all necessary destinations. “You need access to all the regimes,” he supplemented.

Signaling demand
The Space Force is developing procurement plans and constructing an analytical framework for refueling operations, but has not yet included financial requests for these efforts in its yearly budget submission. The organization has not used its own funds but has instead depended on additional allocations from Congress to cover expenses related to servicing, mobility, logistics demonstrations, and prototype projects. This included $30 million in fiscal 2023 to support its contract with Astroscale.

Bulson stated that the Space Force does not intend to allocate significant funds towards developing a specialized government satellite refueling capability. The service wants to emulate the practices of commercial enterprises in this field rather than becoming the anchor tenant.

Bulson informed reporters that they aim to maximize the use of commercial services. “We do not seek a substantial government investment to implement these capabilities.”

She declined to specify if the military will seek financing for space servicing endeavors in its FY25 budget, anticipated to be disclosed this month.

Several firms researching refueling capabilities and other service systems believe that the Space Force is the most suitable customer in the short term due to the lack of a compelling commercial business case for satellite refueling.

Erik Daehler, vice president of orbital systems and services for Sierra Space, stated that commercial satellites are more likely to be decommissioned due to the necessity of refilling their payloads rather than running out of fuel.

Companies are now focusing on deploying smaller, more cost-effective spacecraft with shorter mission durations into low Earth orbit, which is approximately 1,200 miles above the Earth’s surface. This trend has decreased the demand for refueling services.

“This suggests that the U.S. government is likely a main anchor tenant,” Daehler informed C4ISRNET.

Some firms believe that the military should have a more significant role in assisting the emerging market, even if a commercial business case develops. This involves conveying a more forceful demand message through regular funding and specific requirements.

Lauren Smith, in charge of Northrop’s in-space refueling initiatives, expressed that the Space Force’s creation of a program office focused on servicing, mobility, and logistics is a good move but insufficient.

Smith emphasized the need to have the technology listed as a line item in a budget for its advancement, as stated in C4ISRNET. The issue becomes how quickly they need our help if there isn’t enough money to address the urgency they’ve expressed. This will help to expedite and advance progress.

She mentioned that in addition to conveying its needs through financing and budget allocations, the Space Force would benefit from precise specifications from the Space Technologies Command to assist companies in designing technologies that align with the service’s military-specific objectives.

Smith emphasized the importance of minimizing redesign. “Having a clear understanding of their objectives from the beginning allows us to be more focused and effective.”

Interface protocols
Companies are urging the Space Force to set standards for the refueling ports or interfaces required by upcoming spacecraft.

The military collaborated with multiple firms to endorse interfaces that might be used as standards for the satellites. In January, it officially approved Northrop’s Passive Refueling Module as a viable option.

The Space Force is assessing interfaces from various companies, such as Orbit Fab, to expand the availability of designs for wider use.

Sierra Space’s Daehler emphasized the significance of creating common standards for companies building refueling and servicing capabilities to guarantee compatibility of interfaces.

He emphasized the urgent need for Sierra Space, the company developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane for NASA and targeting a 2025 launch of a fast demonstration platform.

“We seek a standard that can be universally accepted, ensuring its usability when we implement it,” Daehler stated. We must be prepared for launch in 2025 to meet our refueling requirements. A standard must be available immediately.

As Editor here at GeekReply, I'm a big fan of all things Geeky. Most of my contributions to the site are technology related, but I'm also a big fan of video games. My genres of choice include RPGs, MMOs, Grand Strategy, and Simulation. If I'm not chasing after the latest gear on my MMO of choice, I'm here at GeekReply reporting on the latest in Geek culture.

Engineering

Solar power surpassed coal in Texas for a whole month, marking the first time this has occurred

Published

on

There is a significant shift taking place in the way we generate electricity, even in the areas where it faces strong opposition. Texas is a prime example of the remarkable progress in renewable power, with continuous record-breaking achievements despite facing opposition from influential individuals.

In February 2021, a severe cold snap placed immense strain on the Texas electricity grid, resulting in extensive blackouts that tragically resulted in the loss of life and brought the region perilously close to catastrophe. As expected, certain individuals quickly pointed fingers at wind power as the cause of the issues, despite the fact that the majority of the capacity loss occurred in gas-fired power stations. They were, however, accompanied by a large number of influential Texas politicians, including the governor, which strongly suggested that they would favor continuously operating energy sources.

Instead, there has been a remarkable increase in the installation of photovoltaic panels since then. In March, solar power surpassed coal as the leading source of electricity in Texas, marking a significant milestone.

According to the Institute for Energy Economic and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the main power grid for most Texans, used a significant amount of solar-generated electricity in March. The total consumption reached 3.26 million megawatt hours (MWh). In comparison, 2.96 million MWh were generated from coal, making the difference approximately 10 percent.

In March, solar production experienced a significant increase of 56 percent compared to the previous year. This growth was three times higher than the March that occurred after the devastating freeze.

IEEFA highlights a series of significant achievements. In March, solar energy accounted for over 10 percent of ERCOT’s electricity generation, marking a significant milestone. At the same time, coal’s contribution fell below 10 percent for the first time.

Even in January, solar power played a crucial role in preventing a system meltdown during a cold snap by meeting nearly a quarter of the demand in the middle of the day.

The records will continue to be broken. By the end of the year, Texas is projected to add over 7 gigawatts (GW) of solar capacity to its grid, representing a nearly 30% increase from current levels. Despite potentially less favorable weather conditions, next March is expected to bring even more significant growth in solar energy. Exciting developments are in the works for additional enhancements in 2025. According to the Energy Information Administration, a government agency, solar power is projected to surpass coal as the primary source of electricity in Texas for the entire year.

The demand in Texas is not experiencing significant growth to accommodate the surplus production, especially when considering the slower growth of wind power. Consequently, there is a need to eliminate something from the market. Up until now, the primary source has been coal, not gas. In 2017, approximately 30% of the energy consumed in Texas came from coal. This year, it might exceed 10 percent for the year, even though it dipped below in March, but if it does, it won’t be by a significant margin.

Texans have been known for their tendency to go big in everything they do, including their use of coal. However, times are changing. Last year, it consumed twice as much coal for electricity compared to any other state. The decrease in coal usage in Texas has outpaced the national average, although other states are also making significant progress.

Critics of renewable energy often claim that solar power is ineffective when the sun is not shining. However, it is worth noting that Texas is currently at the forefront of battery installation in the United States. Actually, it’s going above and beyond. When it comes to solar, Texas and America as a whole lag significantly behind China in absolute terms and many countries on a per capita basis. However, when it comes to large-scale battery systems that can store surplus energy during the day and discharge it in the evening, Texas is at the forefront of global innovation.

In a recent report, it was stated that Texas currently has 5.2 GW of operational battery storage, with projections indicating that this number will increase to 10.9 GW by the end of the year. Solar power will ensure that the lights stay on long into the night.

Renewable energy has faced opposition for years from skeptics who doubted its viability, only to be proven wrong time and time again by its success in various locations.

One of the main factors driving the rapid growth of solar energy in Texas, despite the challenges posed by a government that is not particularly supportive of renewable power, is its significantly lower cost compared to other alternatives. If that’s true in Texas, the largest source of fossil gas in the United States, it’s likely that other places will soon follow suit with the energy revolution.

Continue Reading

Engineering

Anduril advances in the Pentagon program aimed at developing unmanned combat jets

Published

on

Anduril Industries has made significant progress in its ambition to become the leading American prime contractor, surpassing major defense organizations in the development and testing of small unmanned fighter jet prototypes.

The venture capital favorite outperformed Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman in securing the order as part of the Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program. General Atomics was one of the five recipients of the prize.

As part of the contract work, Anduril and General Atomics will collaborate to design, manufacture, and test “production representative test articles,” according to a statement by the Air Force. The Air Force will make a definitive manufacturing decision in fiscal year 2026 and get fully operational aircraft from vendors by the end of the decade, resulting in a multibillion-dollar investment. The Air Force’s decision to choose multiple companies for delivering production aircraft remains uncertain.

The agreement has the potential to be highly profitable for Anduril. The ultimate goal of the CCA program is to produce a minimum of 1,000 combat aircraft that will operate alongside manned platforms, such as the F-35, and independently deploy their own weapons. The CCA program is a component of the Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance strategy, which seeks to update the entirety of its flying systems, including piloted aircraft. Boeing and Lockheed are currently being considered for contracts related to manned systems.

Anduril’s success is largely attributed to Fury, an independent aerial vehicle that it obtained through the acquisition of Blue Force Technologies, a company based in North Carolina, last year. Anduril swiftly transitioned from acquiring the technology to achieving a significant defense award within a year.

Investors, including Founders Fund, valued the seven-year-old company Anduril at $8.5 billion in 2022 when it announced its $1.48 billion Series E. The renowned 31-year-old co-founder of the company, Palmer Luckey, has been vocal about his goal to overturn the prevailing zero-sum model in defense spending, where the defense industry giants emerge victorious while the taxpayer suffers. He aims to achieve this by constructing more affordable assets at a significantly accelerated rate.

“Anduril’s involvement in this program has only just started,” stated Jason Levin, Senior Vice President of Anduril. “To ensure the future success of the United States and its allies, it is necessary to deliver CCAs (countermeasures) with a high level of efficiency, affordability, and magnitude in order to surpass the advancing threat.” We anticipate the continuation of our relationship with the U.S. Air Force in order to promptly provide this essential capacity to our Airmen.

Continue Reading

Engineering

IBM expands its presence in hybrid cloud management through the acquisition of HashiCorp for $6.4 billion

Published

on

IBM made a strategic decision to shift its focus from being solely a provider of cloud infrastructure. This decision was based on the realization that it would not be able to effectively compete with the dominant players in the market, namely Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Subsequently, it has transitioned to assisting IT departments in overseeing intricate hybrid setups, leveraging its financial influence to procure a collection of prominent organizations.

The sequence of acquisitions began with the $34 billion purchase of Red Hat in 2018, followed by the acquisition of Apptio last year. The trend continued on Wednesday with the announcement of the acquisition of cloud management firm HashiCorp for $6.4 billion.

By acquiring HashiCorp, IBM gains access to a suite of cloud lifecycle management and security solutions, as well as a rapidly growing company that outpaces all of IBM’s other ventures. Despite a 15% increase from the previous year, HashiCorp’s revenue, which totaled $155 million in the most recent quarter, is rather meager by IBM’s standards. This addition further strengthens IBM’s expanding portfolio of hybrid cloud technologies, contributing to the company’s overall growth and success.

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna recognizes the significance of this component for his company’s hybrid approach, and he also included an AI reference to emphasize its importance. HashiCorp has a demonstrated history of helping clients effectively handle the intricacies of modern infrastructure and the proliferation of applications. The integration of IBM’s portfolio and expertise with HashiCorp’s skills and talent will result in the development of a comprehensive hybrid cloud platform specifically tailored for the AI era,” he stated in a formal declaration.

Last year, HashiCorp gained attention for modifying the license of its open-source Terraform program to be more advantageous for the firm. The community involved in the development of Terraform expressed dissatisfaction and retaliated by creating a new open-source alternative named OpenTofu. HashiCorp has accused the new community of misappropriating Terraform’s open source code by creating the OpenTofu branch. Given the recent acquisition by IBM, it will be intriguing to observe whether the corporation will persist in pursuing this particular mindset.

It is important to mention that Red Hat gained significant attention last year when it modified its open source licensing conditions, which also generated concern within the open source community. These organizations may be a good match, both in terms of their software and their evolving attitudes towards open source.

Recently, the business unveiled a new platform called the Infrastructure Cloud, which is expected to seamlessly integrate with IBM’s hybrid cloud product lineup. Although they did not contribute significantly in terms of functionality, they did consolidate the products into a single entity, facilitating the presentation to clients by the sales and marketing teams.

If IBM applies a comparable approach to HashiCorp as it does to Red Hat, HashiCorp would retain its autonomy within the IBM product portfolio. Tim Crawford, a former CIO of AVOA, advises the organization to keep a neutral stance.

“I have concerns about IBM deviating from Hashicorp’s impartial approach of collaborating with various cloud providers and instead prioritizing IBM Cloud.” In a recent blog article, Crawford expressed doubt that this would remain the situation, citing IBM’s recent demonstration of their increased openness towards rival cloud providers.

HashiCorp was established in 2012 and secured about $350 million in funding prior to its first public offering in 2021.

Continue Reading

Trending