Engineering
The Space Force is considering refueling options while the sector is requesting cash and standards
In April 2007, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency showcased the capability to refuel a satellite in orbit by outfitting a spacecraft with a robotic arm, connecting it to another spacecraft, and transferring around 32 pounds of hydrazine into its fuel tank.
Fred Kennedy, who oversaw the project for DARPA, stated that the mission, called Orbital Express, achieved several technological milestones.
The U.S. mission not only highlighted the first-ever in-space refueling operation but also demonstrated the capability to employ tracking and imaging sensors to attach to a receiving satellite and do maintenance tasks like replacing a battery or flight computer.
Kennedy emphasized that autonomy was the key aspect during an interview with C4ISRNET on February 27. “We demonstrated an efficient method to approach a spacecraft closely and provide a range of servicing capabilities.”
Four months after its launch, the Air Force and NASA, DARPA’s mission partners, terminated the program.
The project lacked a clear mission application and was planned to support a space-based radar program that was terminated before Orbital Express began.
DARPA is accustomed to outcomes that are not surprising, as their projects frequently delve into cutting-edge technologies. Kennedy stated that he and his team stopped working on the project, expecting that the refueling and service concepts they showcased would reappear as agencies recognized their significance.
Kennedy stated that all of them believed there might be a brief pause. “No one anticipated that it would require 18 years to truly begin seeing the benefits of those accomplishments.”
According to a request from U.S. Space Command authorities to complete by the end of the decade, the Space Force is currently looking into the military benefits of including refueling capabilities in future space domain awareness satellites.
In 2020, the Space Force recognized servicing, mobility, and logistics as fundamental skills. The service has developed comprehensive requirements for the mission area. It formed a program office last year to coordinate development efforts and collaborate with companies to show refueling capabilities.
According to a request from U.S. Space Command authorities, the Space Force is currently looking into the military advantages of including refillable tanks on upcoming space domain awareness satellites before the end of the decade.
In 2020, the Space Force selected servicing, mobility, and logistics as essential skills. The service has developed comprehensive requirements for the mission area. It established a specialized program office last year to coordinate short- and long-term development initiatives and collaborate with enterprises to showcase refueling capabilities.
Current and former government and industry officials suggest that, due to pioneering flights like Orbital Express and initiatives from the commercial sector, the current difficulty is not primarily technological as momentum grows towards implementing these concepts. The Space Force’s objective is to establish a clear vision for the military’s use of on-orbit servicing and to play a role in funding and setting the standards that will influence the market in the short term.
Kennedy, the current leader of Dark Fission Space Systems, believes that the success of the company’s goal to advance nuclear thermal propulsion will rely heavily on the Space Force following through on its promises with tangible actions.
He stated that although words are pleasant, it is imperative that we start moving promptly. “I believe we have already waited 18 years excessively.”
Dynamic spatial operations
On-orbit servicing encompasses many capabilities designed to prolong a satellite’s lifespan or alter its mission performance. That may encompass refueling, maintenance, improvements, or supplying an additional propulsion source.
The Space Force began to focus more on on-orbit servicing a few years ago, but a significant shift occurred in 2022 when Space Command acknowledged that the satellites used to monitor the space environment were constrained by low fuel levels.
The purpose of the Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program satellites is to act as a surveillance system in geosynchronous orbit, approximately 22,000 miles above Earth. The GSSAP satellites conduct rendezvous and proximity operations to approach and observe other spacecraft, especially those belonging to U.S. adversaries, in order to gather data on them.
Satellites, like other military space assets, were launched with a finite amount of fuel, which usually determines their operational lifespan. Lt. Gen. John Shaw, the former deputy chief of Space Command, noted that the limitation of not needing to maneuver may be suitable for a GPS or communication satellite, but it hinders the Space Force’s utilization of GSSAP and other space domain awareness systems.
Shaw informed C4ISRNET that Space Command was instructing GSSAP operators to focus on observing specific objects, use various maneuvers to increase stealth, and prevent the owners of those assets from detecting their approach.
Shaw says that the operators pushed back, saying that the satellites didn’t have enough fuel to make those moves and still be useful until the end of their useful lives.
That answer worried him. Understanding threats in space depends on being aware of the space domain, but these satellites’ limitations made it hard for them to do their job easily.
“I asked myself, ‘How much is this limiting us?'” “How did we get to this point where we’ve learned to be helpless and give up on going after certain targets?” Shaw asked. Shaw retired from Space Command in October 2023 and was named to Sierra Space’s strategic council group in February. “It was pretty important when we started to peel it back.”
As he shared his findings with others in Space Command, Shaw noted that the concerns began to escalate, evolving into a concept he refers to as dynamic space operations. The updated operational approach includes satellites that are more agile and can move more easily to examine the space environment or evade hostile threats or debris.
The concept of dynamic space operations relies on the presence of maintenance, mobility, and logistics technologies, such as refueling. Last year, Space Command urged the Space Force to promptly establish these capabilities.
The military responded quickly. The new procurement office, under the leadership of Col. Joyce Bulson, has been organizing tabletop exercises and preparing demonstrations to enhance the Space Force’s ability to satisfy operators’ current and future needs.
Bulson recently informed reporters that the Space Force is exploring the use of commercial technologies and capabilities being developed by NASA and DARPA in the mobility and logistics sectors.
DARPA is collaborating with SpaceLogistics, a division of Northrop Grumman, to develop a spacecraft for satellite repairs and upgrades under its Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites program.
NASA, in collaboration with Maxar Technologies, was creating an on-orbit servicing and manufacturing vehicle specifically for satellite repairs. The agency terminated the $2 billion program on March 1 because of exceeding costs and delays.
Bulson stated during a media briefing on January 31 at the Space Mobility Conference in Orlando, Florida, that the technologies and concepts being discussed are built upon existing initiatives by others. “We are not attempting to replicate the current efforts.”
Rigorous analysis
The Space Force is considering conducting refueling demonstrations in the coming years to influence its future strategies. Astroscale U.S. was awarded a $25.5 million contract in September last year by the service to create a refueling spacecraft. The objective is to refuel a satellite using a vehicle in a test scheduled for 2026.
The service is collaborating with the Defense Innovation Unit, the Pentagon’s commercial technology hub, as part of its initiative. Orbit Fab, a Colorado-based company, will construct a fuel depot for Impulse Space’s orbiting servicing spacecraft, Mira. The depot will refill Astroscale’s vehicle using Orbit Fab’s Rapidly Attachable Fluid Transfer Interface, which transfers gas into the spacecraft. The system will also assist in a demonstration by the Air Force Research Laboratory known as Tetra-5.
In addition to refueling, the Space Force is exploring alternative technologies for providing satellites with extra propulsion, such as jetpacks that can be attached to spacecraft running low on fuel.
The acquisition team is planning refueling demonstrations, and the service is conducting further studies to enhance its understanding of how this capability will impact its involvement in future battles. A new Space Futures Command, focused on enhancing the service’s analytical precision, is expected to prioritize satellite refueling as one of its initial emerging mission objectives.
Doug Loverro, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for space strategy and current independent consultant, emphasized the importance of the Space Force analyzing potential scenarios for refueling before implementing a formal program.
“There is much discussion, but there is a lack of analysis demonstrating the feasibility,” he stated. “A comprehensive analysis has not been conducted to determine the specific operational stage where this would be effective, the necessary requirements, and related details.”
Kennedy observed that Space Command has emphasized the necessity of a refueling capacity for its space domain awareness systems, suggesting that the service should also explore how other satellites and missions could leverage mobility and logistical capabilities. That includes transfer vehicles, which are specifically created to transport spacecraft to various orbits.
“If your only request is for GSSAP to have an extended duration,” he stated, “that does not align with the concept of dynamic space operations.”
Access and the resulting repercussions are crucial factors in achieving success by reaching all necessary destinations. “You need access to all the regimes,” he supplemented.
Signaling demand
The Space Force is developing procurement plans and constructing an analytical framework for refueling operations, but has not yet included financial requests for these efforts in its yearly budget submission. The organization has not used its own funds but has instead depended on additional allocations from Congress to cover expenses related to servicing, mobility, logistics demonstrations, and prototype projects. This included $30 million in fiscal 2023 to support its contract with Astroscale.
Bulson stated that the Space Force does not intend to allocate significant funds towards developing a specialized government satellite refueling capability. The service wants to emulate the practices of commercial enterprises in this field rather than becoming the anchor tenant.
Bulson informed reporters that they aim to maximize the use of commercial services. “We do not seek a substantial government investment to implement these capabilities.”
She declined to specify if the military will seek financing for space servicing endeavors in its FY25 budget, anticipated to be disclosed this month.
Several firms researching refueling capabilities and other service systems believe that the Space Force is the most suitable customer in the short term due to the lack of a compelling commercial business case for satellite refueling.
Erik Daehler, vice president of orbital systems and services for Sierra Space, stated that commercial satellites are more likely to be decommissioned due to the necessity of refilling their payloads rather than running out of fuel.
Companies are now focusing on deploying smaller, more cost-effective spacecraft with shorter mission durations into low Earth orbit, which is approximately 1,200 miles above the Earth’s surface. This trend has decreased the demand for refueling services.
“This suggests that the U.S. government is likely a main anchor tenant,” Daehler informed C4ISRNET.
Some firms believe that the military should have a more significant role in assisting the emerging market, even if a commercial business case develops. This involves conveying a more forceful demand message through regular funding and specific requirements.
Lauren Smith, in charge of Northrop’s in-space refueling initiatives, expressed that the Space Force’s creation of a program office focused on servicing, mobility, and logistics is a good move but insufficient.
Smith emphasized the need to have the technology listed as a line item in a budget for its advancement, as stated in C4ISRNET. The issue becomes how quickly they need our help if there isn’t enough money to address the urgency they’ve expressed. This will help to expedite and advance progress.
She mentioned that in addition to conveying its needs through financing and budget allocations, the Space Force would benefit from precise specifications from the Space Technologies Command to assist companies in designing technologies that align with the service’s military-specific objectives.
Smith emphasized the importance of minimizing redesign. “Having a clear understanding of their objectives from the beginning allows us to be more focused and effective.”
Interface protocols
Companies are urging the Space Force to set standards for the refueling ports or interfaces required by upcoming spacecraft.
The military collaborated with multiple firms to endorse interfaces that might be used as standards for the satellites. In January, it officially approved Northrop’s Passive Refueling Module as a viable option.
The Space Force is assessing interfaces from various companies, such as Orbit Fab, to expand the availability of designs for wider use.
Sierra Space’s Daehler emphasized the significance of creating common standards for companies building refueling and servicing capabilities to guarantee compatibility of interfaces.
He emphasized the urgent need for Sierra Space, the company developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane for NASA and targeting a 2025 launch of a fast demonstration platform.
“We seek a standard that can be universally accepted, ensuring its usability when we implement it,” Daehler stated. We must be prepared for launch in 2025 to meet our refueling requirements. A standard must be available immediately.
Artificial Intelligence
Google DeepMind Shows Off A Robot That Plays Table Tennis At A Fun “Solidly Amateur” Level
Have you ever wanted to play table tennis but didn’t have anyone to play with? We have a big scientific discovery for you! Google DeepMind just showed off a robot that could give you a run for your money in a game. But don’t think you’d be beaten badly—the engineers say their robot plays at a “solidly amateur” level.
From scary faces to robo-snails that work together to Atlas, who is now retired and happy, it seems like we’re always just one step away from another amazing robotics achievement. But people can still do a lot of things that robots haven’t come close to.
In terms of speed and performance in physical tasks, engineers are still trying to make machines that can be like humans. With the creation of their table-tennis-playing robot, a team at DeepMind has taken a step toward that goal.
What the team says in their new preprint, which hasn’t been published yet in a peer-reviewed journal, is that competitive matches are often incredibly dynamic, with complicated movements, quick eye-hand coordination, and high-level strategies that change based on the opponent’s strengths and weaknesses. Pure strategy games like chess, which robots are already good at (though with… mixed results), don’t have these features. Games like table tennis do.
People who play games spend years practicing to get better. The DeepMind team wanted to make a robot that could really compete with a human opponent and make the game fun for both of them. They say that their robot is the first to reach these goals.
They came up with a library of “low-level skills” and a “high-level controller” that picks the best skill for each situation. As the team explained in their announcement of their new idea, the skill library has a number of different table tennis techniques, such as forehand and backhand serves. The controller uses descriptions of these skills along with information about how the game is going and its opponent’s skill level to choose the best skill that it can physically do.
The robot began with some information about people. It was then taught through simulations that helped it learn new skills through reinforcement learning. It continued to learn and change by playing against people. Watch the video below to see for yourself what happened.
“It’s really cool to see the robot play against players of all skill levels and styles.” Our goal was for the robot to be at an intermediate level when we started. “It really did that, all of our hard work paid off,” said Barney J. Reed, a professional table tennis coach who helped with the project. “I think the robot was even better than I thought it would be.”
The team held competitions where the robot competed against 29 people whose skills ranged from beginner to advanced+. The matches were played according to normal rules, with one important exception: the robot could not physically serve the ball.
The robot won every game it played against beginners, but it lost every game it played against advanced and advanced+ players. It won 55% of the time against opponents at an intermediate level, which led the team to believe it had reached an intermediate level of human skill.
The important thing is that all of the opponents, no matter how good they were, thought the matches were “fun” and “engaging.” They even had fun taking advantage of the robot’s flaws. The more skilled players thought that this kind of system could be better than a ball thrower as a way to train.
There probably won’t be a robot team in the Olympics any time soon, but it could be used as a training tool. Who knows what will happen in the future?
The preprint has been put on arXiv.
Engineering
New concrete that doesn’t need cement could cut carbon emissions in the construction industry
Even though concrete is a very common building material, it is not at all the most environmentally friendly choice. Because of this, scientists and engineers have been looking for alternatives that are better for the environment. They may have found one: concrete that doesn’t need cement.
Cement production, which is a crucial ingredient in concrete, ranks as the third most significant contributor to human-caused carbon emissions globally. Nevertheless, in recent years, a multitude of alternative techniques for producing more environmentally friendly concrete have surfaced. One proposed method involves utilizing industrial waste and steel slag as CO2-reducing additives in the concrete mixture. Another suggestion is to utilize spent coffee grounds to enhance the strength of the concrete while reducing the amount of sand required.
However, a certain company has devised a technique to produce cement-free concrete suitable for commercial enterprises.
The concrete has the potential to have a net reduction in carbon dioxide and has the ability to prevent approximately 1 metric ton of carbon emissions for every metric ton used. If this statement is accurate, the cement-free binder will serve as a noteworthy substitute for Portland cement. According to BGR, the new concrete also complies with all the industry standards of traditional cement concrete, ensuring that there is no compromise in terms of strength and durability.
While it is still in the early stages, the situation seems encouraging. C-Crete Technologies, a company specializing in materials science and holding the patents for a novel form of concrete, has utilized approximately 140 tons of this new cast-in-place (pourable) concrete in recent construction endeavors.
In September 2023, the company was granted an initial sum of almost $1 million, promptly succeeded by an additional $2 million, by the US Department of Energy to advance the progress of its technology. In addition, it has garnered numerous accolades that are facilitating its growth in operations.
The widespread adoption of cement-free concrete in future construction projects has the potential to significantly alter the environmental impact of the industry. Although C-Crete seems to be one of the few companies currently exploring these new alternatives on a large scale, it is likely that others will also start embracing them in the near future.
Engineering
To get gold back from electronic waste, the Royal Mint of the UK is using a new method
There are hidden mountains of gold in the junkyards, full of old smartphones, computers that don’t work anymore, and broken laptops. A new project in the UK wants to find and use these hidden riches.
The Royal Mint, which makes British coins for the government, has agreed to work with the Canadian clean tech startup Excir to use a “world-first technology” that can safely get gold and other precious metals out of electronic waste (e-waste) and recycle them.
Electronic devices have circuit boards that have small amounts of gold in their connections because gold is a good conductor. These boards also have useful metals like silver, copper, lead, nickel, and aluminum.
In the past, getting the metals was hard, but Excir’s new technology can quickly and safely recover 99 percent of the gold that is trapped in electronic waste.
They prepare the circuit boards using a “unique process,” and then they use a patented chemical formula to quickly and selectively remove the gold. The liquid that is high in gold is then processed to make pure gold that can be melted down and formed into bars. Palladium, silver, and copper could also be recovered with this method.
“Our entrepreneurial spirit has helped the Royal Mint do well for over 1,100 years, and the Excir technology helps us reach our goal of being a leader in sustainable precious metals.” The chemistry is completely new and can get precious metals back from electronics in seconds. “It has a lot of potential for The Royal Mint and the circular economy, as it helps to reuse our planet’s valuable resources and creates new jobs in the UK,” said Sean Millard, Chief Growth Officer at The Royal Mint.
At the moment, about 22% of electronic waste is collected, stored properly, and recycled. But with this kind of new technology, the problem of old electronics could be lessened.
Every year, the world makes about 62 million metric tons of electronic waste, which is more than 1.5 million 40-tonne trucks’ worth. That number will go up by another 32% by 2030 as more people buy electronics. This will make it the fastest-growing source of solid waste in the world.
The World Health Organization says that e-waste is hazardous waste because it contains harmful materials and can leak harmful chemicals if it is not handled properly. For example, old electronics can release lead and mercury into the environment, which can affect the development of the central nervous system while a person is pregnant, as a baby, as a child, or as a teen. Also, e-waste doesn’t break down naturally and builds up in nature.
Aside from being a huge waste, this is also a big problem for the environment. There could be between $57 billion and $62 billion worth of precious metals in dumps and scrap yards.
- Gadgets10 years ago
Why the Nexus 7 is still a good tablet in 2015
- Mobile Devices10 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs Galaxy Note 5: is there room for improvement?
- Editorials10 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 – How bad updates prevent people from enjoying their phones
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 5 2015 and Android M born to be together
- Gaming10 years ago
New Teaser For Five Nights At Freddy’s 4
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Google not releasing Android M to Nexus 7
- Gadgets10 years ago
Moto G Android 5.0.2 Lollipop still has a memory leak bug
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 7 2015: Huawei and Google changing the game