Connect with us

Technology

The proliferation of missile threats is increasing, this is the approach the Pentagon is employing to stay current

blank

Published

on

blank

In response to the increasing number of missile threats, the Missile Defense Agency is seeking to employ new sensors, advanced digital tools, and make modifications to older interceptors.

During a CSIS event on Thursday, Lt. Gen. Heath Collins, the MDA director, stated that a recent modification to the booster rocket of the Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) will enhance its effectiveness.

The GBI serves as a countermeasure against intercontinental ballistic missiles, albeit with a highly restricted capacity, consisting of only 40 interceptors in Alaska and four in California. The concept of operations in this system has been likened to the act of intercepting a bullet with another bullet. In tests, its performance has been slightly superior to a random coin toss. The Pentagon’s attempt to enhance their precision through an intricate multi-warhead initiative known as the Redesigned Kill Vehicle was terminated in 2019 due to its excessive difficulty and expense.

Collins, however, claimed that in December, staff members from MDA at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California discovered a relatively simple technique to improve GBI’s performance.

“We showcased two capabilities, one of which was the ability to choose between a three-stage or two-stage launch. This was a novel capability that we introduced.” The GBI was initially designed with a tripartite structure consisting of three stages. Presently, all GBIs in use employ all three stages. The separation of the kill vehicle is contingent upon the complete burning of all three stages. Therefore, one must patiently wait for the three stages to burn before initiating separation in order to successfully execute an intercept.

However, a meticulous examination revealed that by merely extending the time between the second and third stage launches, they were able to gain additional minutes of intercept space and decision space. This allowed them to potentially intercept scenarios that were previously unattainable.

Collins stated that incorporating contemporary digital and information tools into the agency will facilitate the discovery of additional enhancements in performance.

One important question is whether these fast and inexpensive solutions can effectively address new missile challenges, such as the recent threat made by Russian leader Vladimir Putin to provide long-range strike weapons to proxy forces attacking Western targets. Russia has promoted its new hypersonic missiles as “invincible,” but they have been shown to be susceptible to interception by Patriot interceptors in Ukraine, and they may also be vulnerable to SM-6 missiles.

The Pentagon has been implementing a long-term strategy to deploy groups of satellites in low-Earth orbit in order to improve the tracking of new hypersonic weapons as they perform complex maneuvers. According to Collins from the MDA, the emergence of new space and launch companies is also generating a new market for hypersonic vehicles that can be utilized for target practice.

“We are currently focusing on studying hypersonic targets in the near future. This is because once we have an interceptor, we need to be able to accurately identify and aim at these targets,” he explained.

According to the speaker, the collaboration between MDA and small, innovative teams and businesses can be highly advantageous. By assisting these entities in reaching a level of capability that aligns with the requirements at the intersection, MDA can enhance its testing capabilities, ultimately benefiting the organization in the long term.

Collins did not specifically mention a recent aerial threat that U.S. military personnel face: quick, highly developed unmanned aerial vehicles that occasionally make it difficult to tell the difference between a robotic device and a projectile. However, he did emphasize that the Iranian assault on Israel in April, which utilized numerous missiles in addition to strike drones, was the most extensive we have ever witnessed. Furthermore, it predicts that there will be more in the future.

The responsibility for countering large drone swarms is more likely to be assigned to ground forces, potentially equipped with the capabilities offered by MDA.

The commander of U.S. Army Futures Command recently stated that the challenge of drone swarms in the future may not be as formidable as it appears on the current battlefield in Ukraine. During a CSIS event on Monday, Gen. James Rainy stated that the United States will establish a significantly larger and better-coordinated military presence to address the issue.

“I am slightly more hopeful because there is no evidence of anyone effectively carrying out coordinated military operations involving different branches and units.” If someone were operating unmanned aerial systems (UAS) towards us, we would engage in combat with the UAS. However, we would also engage in combat against the enemy’s origin, in addition to their tactical force, while also deploying our combined military force. Therefore, I am slightly more hopeful. Deploying the quadcopter grenade into the turret of an M1 tank becomes challenging when it approaches at a speed of 70 kilometers per hour, accompanied by several hundred similar tanks, while you are also engulfed in flames. It is challenging.

As Editor here at GeekReply, I'm a big fan of all things Geeky. Most of my contributions to the site are technology related, but I'm also a big fan of video games. My genres of choice include RPGs, MMOs, Grand Strategy, and Simulation. If I'm not chasing after the latest gear on my MMO of choice, I'm here at GeekReply reporting on the latest in Geek culture.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Space Exploration

More proof that asteroid Bennu came from a wet world comes from “tantalizingly beautiful” rocks

blank

Published

on

blank

The sample that OSIRIS-REx took from the asteroid Bennu continues to give us new information about the past of this small space rock and the early Solar System. After the sample was opened a few weeks ago, signs began to appear that Bennu may have had a wet past. There is now another finding to add to that.

Researchers have said that magnesium-sodium phosphate has been found. It came as a surprise because the ship hadn’t seen it from orbit. It makes the case for Bennu being a broken piece of a much bigger, primitive ocean world even stronger.

The Japanese Space Agency’s Hayabusa-2 picked up a piece of an asteroid from Ryugu and found phosphate minerals on it. Earth rocks have also had them in them. But the Bennu sample stands out because the grains are so pure and big.

An asteroid called Bennu may have been wet in the past because of the phosphates and other elements and compounds that are found on it. Dante Lauretta, co-lead author of the paper and chief scientist for OSIRIS-REx at the University of Arizona, Tucson, said this in a statement. “Bennu might have lived in a wetter world in the past.” But this hypothesis needs to be looked into more.

One of the people who worked on the study and is in charge of OSIRIS-REx at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said, “OSIRIS-REx gave us exactly what we hoped for: a large, clean asteroid sample rich in nitrogen and carbon from a world that used to be wet.”

For many reasons, the team thinks of Bennu as a part of the ocean world. For example, serpentinite is present. This is a type of rock that forms when hot rocks meet water, like on Earth’s mid-ocean ridges. Additionally, a lot of the substances that dissolve appear to have moved with the help of water. The fact that phosphates are real can be added to that list.

The team suggests a body with a lot of liquid water, maybe with a hard or icy exterior. A good example is Enceladus, Saturn’s icy moon. Bennu’s parent body would be about 250 kilometers (155 miles) across, which is half of it. In the past, objects have struck the 1,630-foot-wide Bennu, which measures 500 meters.

“We are still thinking of ways to test [the wet parent body hypothesis].” But, according to Professor Lauretta, it’s the most likely place where these rocks formed. He said this in an exclusive chat in March.

The sample is still being sent to labs in the US and around the world. The valuable material was being moved around for a long time before it arrived. The team shared 58 results from the first study in March, and every week there are new discoveries. It will be possible to get even more science as the number of scientists grows.

“The rocks from Bennu are enticingly beautiful,” said Harold Connolly, who is the co-lead author of the study and a sample scientist for the OSIRIS-REx mission at Rowan University in Glassboro, New Jersey. “Every week, the OSIRIS-REx Sample Analysis Team finds new, sometimes surprising information that helps us understand where Earth-like planets came from and how they changed over time.”

The study is written up in the Meteoritics & Planetary Science magazine.

Continue Reading

Space Exploration

Plans are being made by NASA to crash the International Space Station into the ocean

blank

Published

on

blank

Living in space nonstop for almost 24 years, with astronauts and cosmonauts living on the ship since October 10, 2000, when astronaut Bill Shepherd and cosmonauts Yuri Gidzenko and Sergei Krikalev took their first steps on board the International Space Station (ISS).

There will come a time when everything good has to end, and NASA is now making plans for that time to come. The US space agency said on Wednesday that it has chosen SpaceX to design and build the Deorbit Vehicle. This vehicle will be used to safely bring the space station down to Earth when its time is up.

If the US Deorbit Vehicle is chosen for the International Space Station, it will help NASA and its partners make sure that the end of station operations is a safe and responsible one in low Earth orbit. “This decision also backs up NASA’s plans for future commercial destinations and lets people keep using space close to Earth,” said Ken Bowersox, who is the associate administrator for the Space Operations Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. “For the benefit of everyone, the orbital laboratory is still a model for science, exploration, and working together in space.”

The first parts of the ISS were sent into space in 1998. When their work is done in 2030, they will have been in space for two years longer than they were supposed to. The skeleton of the space station is made up of these parts, which means the ISS can’t go on after 2030.

“A lot of the space station can be fixed or replaced in space, and other parts can be sent back to Earth to be fixed and then sent back into space again.” “These parts include the science hardware, communications gear, life support gear, and solar arrays,” NASA says. “However, the primary structure of the station, such as the crewed modules and the truss structures, cannot be repaired or replaced practically.”

The space station moves in and out of sunlight, and spaceships dock and undock from it. This puts stress on the structures.

“These forces were accounted for in the original 30-year structural life estimate, and while NASA’s flown experience indicates the actual forces imparted to the station have been less than originally forecast, there is still a finite lifetime available in the primary structure,” said NASA.

As the space station has aged, leaks have started to appear, even though it has worked very well for a long time. Five space agencies worked together on an amazing project to run a lab high above our heads at about 28,000 kilometers per hour (17,500 miles per hour). NASA is now planning for the end of the project. SpaceX will run the project, which could be worth $843 million, but NASA will own and run the Deorbit Vehicle and mission to take the old space station out of orbit.

Continue Reading

Medicine and Health

Toxic chemicals leak out of plastic bottles when they are exposed to sunlight

blank

Published

on

blank

If you don’t want to drink a bunch of chemicals that could be harmful, keep your water bottle out of the sun. Plastic water bottles that are left out in the sun break down and release many different types of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

VOCs are chemicals that evaporate quickly at room temperature. They are found in a lot of different products, like paints, cleaners, fuels, and solvents. They’re also made of plastic, like those used to make water bottles and food trucks. Many of them are safe, but some may be bad for your health in the short and long term.

In the most recent study, UV-A light and sunlight were used to test six different kinds of plastic water bottles in China. They discovered that this process let out a wide range of VOCs, such as acids, alcohols, aldehydes, and alkanes.

Some signs pointed to “highly toxic” VOCs, such as n-hexadecane, which is known to cause cancer.

A single sip of contaminated water doesn’t pose much of a health risk, but the researchers found that long-term exposure may pose a greater risk.

“Our results are strong proof that plastic bottles can release harmful chemicals into the air when they are exposed to sunlight.” “Consumers need to be aware of these risks, especially in places where bottled water is left out in the sun for long periods of time,” said Dr. Huase Ou, lead researcher from China’s Jinan University’s Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health.

However, the researchers were quick to point out that the risk seems to be pretty low since the bottle only releases a small amount of chemicals.

“Given that a container weighs about 20 grams on average, the VOCs that were released from a single container were only a few nanograms.” So, even after long-term exposure, opening a bottle and drinking water from it doesn’t pose many health risks to people, the study’s authors write in the conclusion.

The bottles in the study were all made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is one of the most common types of plastic. However, the VOC composition and concentration of the different bottles were very different. The different production methods and additives seem to have something to do with this.

Most likely, the chemicals leaked out of the bottle because of a process called photodegradation. This is when light breaks down the structure of the plastic.

There are more things than just sunlight that you should think about when it comes to your plastic bottle’s “health.” A study from the past found that leaving water in a plastic bottle for just one day could let hundreds of chemicals get into your drink. Several of these chemicals are thought to be harmful to health, such as those that cause cancer or mess with the hormone system (endocrine disruptors).

In the same way, there is some evidence that heating plastic bottles might not be a good idea. A study done in 2020 found that the sterilization process recommended by the World Health Organization put between 1.3 and 16.2 million microplastic particles per liter into child bottles.

In the 21st century, plastic is found everywhere, from penises to ice in Antarctica. It was once thought to be mostly harmless, but it’s becoming clearer that it’s having a bad effect on us and the planet, and we’re only just beginning to understand how bad it is.

The study was published in the magazine Eco-Environment & Health.

Continue Reading

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x