Reviews
MStar S700 review: quirky phablet for stock Android enthusiasts
Have you ever heard about the Mstar S700? If you’re a fan of Apple or Samsung, you probably didn’t even pay attention even if it was brought up. But that’s a mistake in my opinion, as the Mstar S700, although relatively unknown, presents itself with a great opportunity: pleasing stock Android fans, among others. Although the Mstar S700 is a Chinese smartphone, the bloatware and skinning done to the phone is inexistent, which means you’re getting stock Android 5.0 Lollipop. Mstar is a bit slow with updates, but the company is going to keep the Mstar S700 as well as its other phones up to date when it receives the new builds of Android. The Mstar S700 price is $155 on GearBest, which is a great price that balances bang for buck out impressively. In addition, you can get it even cheaper ($137) for a limited time if you use the coupon S700.
I’ve been using the Mstar S700 as a daily driver for almost a month now, and it’s been filled with ups and downs. Although the positives and negatives about the phone and the user experience balance out, there are some pros and cons that stand out in the end. One of the first things that I noticed was the Mstar S700 battery life, which is not that great. Taking into account that we have a 5.5 inch 720p HD display up front and a 3000 mAh battery to support that, my expectations of the battery life were met. I personally expected this phone to last me a full day with heavy use, and that’s what it did.
Upon my first use, I found that the user experience of the phone was rather balanced and smooth. Performance is exemplary, and even graphics intensive games and apps run smoothly. I haven’t detected any Android 5.0 Lollipop bugs either, which I am very glad to report about. Since my time with the phone is still short by user standards, I will report back with the occasional update to this Mstar S700 review if anything changes, including updates coming in and bugs surfacing within the user interface. Luckily, the notifications system works well, and while there are many out there who don’t like it, I personally prefer it, because I use the MStar S700 with an dot view case.
The Mstar S700 with a dot view case works rather well, although you can’t use many features when the case is on. It’s magnetic and once it’s close to the display, the screen automatically turns off, regardless of what you’re doing in that moment on the phone. Even if you’re in the camera app or in a call, the dot view case triggers the proximity sensor which then turns off the display. That saves a lot of power, although the apps running in the background do take up a lot of power once the dot view case is lifted. There’s not a lot of economy going on energy-wise, but at least there is some, which I enjoy. With the dot view case on, the Mstar S700 can be used either to check the time or to manage music. It’s a simple interface and feature and it’s easy to use.
When it comes to what features the Mstar S700 has, I was pretty impressed. With all the pros and cons put together, for the price, the Mstar S700 is a pretty damn good daily driver. Although I would not recommend it for power users due to its poor battery life, I would recommend it to average smartphone users. With that being said, let’s see how my one month experience with the Mstar S700 yielded. Remember that this is a flagship smartphone that costs $155, which is a surprisingly low price. Some compromises have been made to get to that price point, and it depends on you whether those compromises bother you and whether paying that little for a flagship smartphone is worth the hassle.
Let’s get the cons and specs out of the way so you can figure out whether the Mstar S700 issues are deal breakers for you or not. For me, they weren’t, because you can go around the problems in one way or another. So, the Mstar S700 comes with a 5.5 inch display that has a 720*1280 resolution IPS OGS screen. The screen is very sharp and very bright and the viewing angles on the phone are actually quite impressive. The brightness controls are amazingly well balanced and the auto brightness works surprisingly well, which you don’t see often on flagship smartphones that have sub $200 price tags. The display is impressive, and the capacitative keys surrounding it are metallic. They light up when in use and stay off when not, a bit like the OnePlus One. After one month, there weren’t any scratches on the screen, but truth be told, I used it with a dot view case and a screen protector.
Moving on to the design of the Mstar S700, I would say that this is one of the best features of the phone. Mstar wanted to make a premium smartphone, and that’s what they did with the Mstar S700. Although the back panel is a plastic removable one hiding a removable battery, two SIM card slots and a microSD card slot. Technically, there’s a full SIM card slot and another slot that can be used either for microSD or microSIM, so it depends on you which function you make use of. The phone itself is made out of metal and the frame and front look rather stunning. The feel in the hand of the phone is actually quite nice, because it’s thin as hell and surprisingly light. It still keeps a bit of weight, which actually helps the premium feeling of the phone. In the package, you get the Mstar S700 with a screen protector already on and another spare in the box, which is a good deal.
As I said in the beginning of this review, the Mstar S700 comes with stock Android 5.0 Lollipop, which means there isn’t any bloatware or skinning going on and that improves performance very well. Due to the stock Android interface, the Mstar S700 can be more conservative with its energy use and it can be buttery smooth when it comes to performance. If there was a skin or bloatware on top, I doubt the Mstar S700 performance would be as satisfactory as it is now. The phone runs fast and smooth, but it does tend to overheat quite fast. Not once has it issued a warning or shut down because it overheated, but I did notice that the back panel, near the fingerprint sensor and the camera, got overheated pretty fast. Nonetheless, the Mstar S700 handled two hour long gaming sessions and hour long photo sessions like a champ, without even slowing down or beginning to lag, which I respect very much in a phone, especially if it’s a cheap one.
Feature-wise, Mstar packed a lot of things into this phone, but compromised in key areas as well. As I mentioned earlier, there’s a removable battery and an SD card slot, which are features very important to Android users around the world. The microSD card that I used (Kingston 8 GB one) worked just fine and didn’t affect performance at all. The removable battery is a plus, although it will be hard to find one that suits the Mstar S700. There’s a fingerprint sensor on the rear of the smartphone, which works decently. Although it does not register the fingerprints I had registered correctly each and every time, I would say it’s at a 70 % success rate, which is good for such a phone. Be sure to memorize your passcode in case your fingerprint doesn’t work with the phone, but usually, on the second or third try, the phone registered my fingerprint and unlocked itself immediately.
What I didn’t expect of the Mstar S700 was the sensitivity that its proximity and gesture recognition sensors demonstrated. This can be bad and good at the same time. Quick gestures on the screen bring up apps or the camera in a matter of two seconds tops, which is a great response time. The camera is triggered very fast, which is convenient for on the spot, spontaneous snapshots. You can preset apps to be launched and use various types of gestures to launch them, so the experience is customizable.
There’s also double tap to wake, much like Knock On with the LG G3 and LG G4, but oddly enough, the double tap feature on the home screen doesn’t work to lock the screen, which might be surprising to LG fans. One annoying thing about this sensibility that I was talking about is that without a case, the screen would randomly turn on in my pocket. Which is why I had to turn gestures off, sadly. This is more of a software issue, I believe, so an update from the company might fix this in the future. If not, I’m afraid gestures should be left off with the Mstar S700. Bluetooth 4.0, Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n/ac, 4G LTE and GPS complete the feature list of this cheap stock Android smartphone. I haven’t had any Wi-Fi or data connectivity issues, and the GPS works just fine as on any other smartphone.
A Mediatek MTK6752 64 bit octa core CPU, 2 GB RAM and 16 GB internal storage make up the internals of the Mstar S700, and they’re satisfactory. Although this is mostly mid-range hardware, it performs surprisingly well. The phone’s storage is partitioned, which might not sit well with some power users, which is one of the reasons why I said I wouldn’t actually recommend the Mstar S700 for power users. Mali 760 MP2 graphics complete the picture and handle 3D rather well. You can see Antutu benchmark results throughout this post, so you can see for yourself where that benchmark placed the Mstar S700 with regard to other flagships. It’s not very high up in the ranks, but it’s in a good spot for its price.
Now for the part that impressed me unexpectedly. One of the problems with Chinese flagship smartphones that are as cheap as the Mstar S700 is the camera. That’s the aspect where most companies compromise, but that’s not entirely the case with the Mstar S700 camera. Not only does the camera take great photos, its auto settings are surprisingly good and I would say it’s the perfect phone for those who don’t like to fiddle with settings but want their phones to take good shots by default. The video recording is not that great, as it doesn’t have optical image stabilization, but it’s decent. As long as you try and stand still instead of walking while filming, the videos will come out great. When walking, videos will end up being shaky, but that’s to be expected without serious stabilization.
The photography experience on the Mstar S700 is above average for its category. The camera software is fast and responsive and the processing times are pretty short, which I liked. There aren’t too many manual controls, which is a bit annoying for those who like to frame and position their shots nicely. Nonetheless, there are a few modes that you can make use of, but they’re pretty basic, like monochrome, inverted, sepia and stuff like that. You can use these filters even when filming, which is a very fun experience because it does make for pretty creepy ass videos. The Mstar S700 camera app takes good panoramas and has unique 3D photos and live photos modes. Live photos can be viewed on any platform because they’re in standard video format, but 3D photos are not viewable with standard viewing apps as they’re in different formats.
The Mstar S700 camera measures 13 MP on the rear and 5 MP on the front. There’s a very nice and capable LED flash on the rear, which works pretty great. It even works during video, which is neat. It does cool down colors in dark environments, especially on video, but to an acceptable degree. The front camera is very impressive, even though it’s only a 5 MP sensor. Rarely does it produce noise, even in medium lighting conditions. In low light, it doesn’t really work that well, as one would assume. but if lighting conditions are ok, the selfies are going to be ok. There’s also a beautify mode incorporated, which makes your skin lighter and removes blemishes and makes your eyes bigger, giving your face an airbrushed effect. Needless to say, it’s noticeable that the photos have been altered through processing. But who wants to look fake in their photos for other reasons that fun anyway? I wasn’t bothered by this, I actually enjoyed playing around with it.
Those were all the pros of the Mstar S700, and they’re many, as you can see. I genuinely had a great experience with this phone, up until I tried the following few things. Let’s start at the beginning. At the end of the first day, the Mstar S700 battery konked out, but it only came charged to 55 % percent, so that wasn’t surprising. I’m a rigorous follower of rules when it comes to technology so I drained its battery completely and used its own charger to charge it overnight to full capacity. I didn’t really check how much it charged in a few hours, but after 5 hours or so, when I check, the Mstar S70 battery was still at 35 %. That panicked me a bit, but I said I would let the phone go through three charging cycles, as customary, and see how that influences charging time and battery life.
Fact of the matter is, the Mstar S700 needs about 10 hours to fully charge with its own charger. As I’m a shortcut taker and a fixer, I tried a different adaptor for the phone, using the same USB cable. It worked marvelously. With a third-party charger, the Mstar S700 can be fully charged in two hours, which is amazing. This is cutting corners and it might have negative effects in the long run on the battery, but since it’s replaceable, I’m not making a big deal out of it. The battery life is the same however, but at least I don’t have to wait ten hours for my daily driver to become fully charged.
The other con of the Mstar S700 is connectivity to third-party devices. First off, it’s not plug and play, which is a huge mistake to make in 2015 in my mind. I know I was extremely frustrated for a couple of days because of this issue, until I found a workaround, yet again. You need to install the Wondershare MobileGo app on the Mstar S700 and on your PC. And it won’t work every time. But here’s a quick guide on how you should do it so it will always work. Steps 1 to 3 have to be done only on first connection with a new PC or laptop.
Mstar S700 connect USB to PC guide step by step
Step 1: connect the Mstar S700 via USB to your laptop or PC
Step 2: open the Wondershare MobileGo app on both the phone and the PC
Step 3: follow instructions and scan the QR code the app gives you so that the phone and app can memorize the PCs that you use
Step 4: Just use the application to request connection to the PC that you registered, and accept the request on the PC
It’s easy actually, but it took me some time to figure the steps out, because the app can be a bit complicated at times and it shows through that it wasn’t designed by native English speakers. That’s not a problem, but this guide should help those using the Mstar S700 connect to PC more easily. This was a slight bump in the user experience and it took me a few days to get used to having to employ apps to connect my phone to my laptop. But transfers between the two devices go smoothly and pretty fast, so no complaints there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0AZ0J-WED0
As a conclusion, I would say that the Mstar S700 is an excellent smartphone for its price. The bang for buck is actually pretty amazing if you think about it. The compromises that were made involved the charger and the battery life, but they are not deal breakers in my mind. They might be for some of you, but they’re not for me. One day battery life is what I get with most of my phones because I consider myself a power user, and I have to settle for that, as it were. Compromises had to be made in the engineering of the Mstar S700, and I’m glad that those compromises did not involve the display, performance, camera or features.
The accessories that come with the Mstar S700 are great, especially the headphones. They have great output when it comes to bass and treble and it’s a pleasure to listen to music with them. They’re not too loud and not too silent, which is just perfect and it limits those who tend to listen to music at high volumes and thus damage their hearing (it’s a real consequence people, don’t go deaf just to listen to max volume). The added screen protector is also a nice addition, as is the milky white design of the headphones and the cables and charger. The charger is only 300 mAh, and that’s one of the reasons why the phone charges so slowly.
Overall, I definitely recommend the Mstar S700 for anyone who wants a premium design, a removable battery, microSD support, good performance, good camera and good features. If your main priority when buying a phone is battery life, this might not be for you, unless you want to keep a spare battery around to replace the one you drained during the day. You can buy the Mstar S700 from GearBest for $155 and it’s a great deal. Be prepared to add a bit of VAT and customs fees depending on your state and country when ordering, but GearBest will inform you of this when you order. They also send you the correct power plug/charger for your region, so you don’t have to worry about buying adaptors. Be sure to check out the videos and galleries within this articles to see what kind of images the Mstar S700 camera takes and how video capture looks like.
Gaming
A Review of Fallout 4
After nearly ten years since its initial release, Bethesda has brought Fallout 4 to the PS5, offering enhanced technical performance that one would anticipate from a leap to a new generation. Does the open-world RPG still hold up in 2024?
Answering that question is quite challenging, I must say. While opinions may vary, it’s worth noting that Fallout 4 has its fair share of critics. However, one cannot deny the allure of its captivating gameplay loop, which keeps players hooked with its constant exploration, mutant battles, and character progression. The loop in question has undoubtedly stood the test of time, and Fallout 4 continues to captivate players with its addictive character development mechanics. From acquiring loot to distributing perk points, the game offers a truly engaging experience.
Fallout 4’s post-apocalyptic Boston is yet another example of Bethesda’s talent for creating immersive worlds that captivate and divert your attention from your intended path. This map is incredibly dense, providing adventure at every corner. This open world is incredibly immersive, captivating players for hours on end. The various character progression systems add depth and complexity to the experience.
However, this is where the game begins to show some weaknesses, especially when compared to more contemporary standards. Technical limitations that were already dubious when Fallout 4’s release in 2015 hinder the gameplay experience. It’s quite disappointing to encounter a loading screen every time you enter or exit an interior location, which feels incredibly outdated, even with the significantly improved load times of the PS5 version.
Additionally, comparable restrictions limit the game’s overall scope. Now, it’s clear that one wouldn’t anticipate a radiation-soaked wasteland to be bustling with life, but Boston can’t help but come across as lacking ambition. As you journey through different locations, you’ll notice a noticeable lack of action. Even well-known settlements such as Diamond City and Goodneighbor, which are supposed to be bustling hubs of activity and trade, feel disappointingly empty with a population of only around 30 NPCs.
This illusion may have been somewhat passable back in 2015, but after almost a decade, it’s clear that the game’s outdated engine is to blame for many of its glaring flaws. It’s undeniable that some aspects of Fallout 4’s design haven’t aged well, especially considering how much the open-world genre has evolved in the past decade. While it’s not fair to expect a complete remake in the 2024 re-release, there are certain aspects that could have been improved upon.
Fallout 4 undeniably possesses an alluring atmosphere, capturing that eerie sense of wonder that has become synonymous with the series. There is a unique experience in scaling the remnants of a decrepit skyscraper and surveying the desolate landscape, immersing oneself in the inherent solitude while the game’s subtly captivating music softly plays in the distance.
When it comes to immersion, let’s delve into Fallout 4’s take on role-playing. Upon its release, numerous dedicated Fallout fans expressed their dissatisfaction with the game’s decision to introduce a fully voiced protagonist, along with the limited dialogue choices that accompanied this change. Truly, the absence of morally ambiguous decisions in this game is quite noticeable, especially when comparing it to titles such as Fallout: New Vegas or even Fallout 3. The side quests often guide you towards two predictable options, where you can either embody a beacon of hope or a deranged maniac, and the latter option never truly feels authentic, given the protagonist’s predetermined, almost heroic role in the story.
Emerging from a two-century cryogenic sleep, the protagonist must navigate the treacherous landscape of post-apocalyptic America to save their kidnapped infant son, who was taken from the very same cryogenic facility. In this particular situation, deviating from the main questline may not contribute to the overall narrative coherence. However, it must be acknowledged that the story presents significant opportunities for making impactful decisions that can greatly influence the game world, especially when aligning oneself with pivotal factions.
Once again, it’s worth noting that there is limited opportunity to delve into your character’s personality and motivations in Fallout 4. As a result, the game can be seen as a regression compared to its predecessors. Furthermore, the side quests tend to be quite forgettable. The main plot of Fallout 3 had its fair share of issues, but it managed to find balance by incorporating some wild and unpredictable misadventures. The sequel, on the other hand, lacks personality, featuring one-dimensional characters and unremarkable dialogue. It heavily relies on self-referential storytelling, which can be immersion-breaking.
If you’re interested in seeing faction plotlines come to a conclusion, you’ll have to go through a plethora of ‘radiant’ filler quests. These are the types of games that provide little context and simply place a procedurally generated objective marker on your map, instructing you to “go here, do something.” While the prospect of embarking on an adventure and uncovering hidden treasures is certainly enticing, the overall experience feels somewhat lacking in depth and emotion. It’s hard to ignore the excessive filler content that hinders your progress towards important narrative milestones.
However, it is worth mentioning that the gameplay loop of Fallout 4 is incredibly captivating, and combat plays a vital role in this experience. While it may not boast the most polished shooting mechanics compared to other games on the market, it undeniably stands out as the most enjoyable Fallout installment to date. The action in the game is filled with a satisfying and almost comical bloodlust. Whether you’re sniping super mutants with precision or hacking raiders to bits with modified chainsaws, the result is a spectacle of skulls popping and limbs flying.
The standout feature of the game is undoubtedly V.A.T.S., which grants you the power to manipulate time and execute visually stunning attacks on specific body parts. Even after nearly ten years, there is still no other system quite like it. The version of V.A.T.S. in Fallout 4 truly stands out, offering moments of pure chaos and excitement. Experiencing the exhilarating thrill of a deathclaw’s head exploding mere moments before its talons make contact with your face; being rendered speechless as a mini nuke hurtles directly towards you; obliterating grotesquely mutated wildlife with your beloved energy weapon, all captured in flawless slow motion. This is an exceptional experience.
Regrettably, not everything that Fallout 4 does is met with universal acclaim. Despite being largely overlooked, the game’s settlement system continues to be a topic of heated debate. During your adventure, you’ll stumble upon small communities that you can nurture by collecting various items and utilizing specific materials to construct a wide range of structures. These include essential defenses like walls and gates, as well as intricate computer networks and ingenious mechanical contraptions.
The system itself is undeniably impressive, providing an immense amount of depth for players who truly want to immerse themselves in the experience. If you’re looking for a classic Fallout experience, settlements might come across as unnecessary baggage, adding unnecessary weight to an already content-packed game that can sometimes feel like busywork. It’s quite frustrating how settlements don’t immediately prove their value. The initial phase involves the monotonous task of collecting a vast amount of resources, and that’s just for the basic needs such as shelter, food, and water.
While certain aspects of Fallout 4 may not have stood the test of time, it’s worth noting that the PS5 port does indeed deliver on its commitment to enhancing the game’s technical performance. The game’s performance mode, running at 60 frames per second, is impressively smooth overall, with only occasional minor hitches lasting for a fraction of a second in crowded areas. The smooth frame rate greatly enhances the gunplay, which can sometimes feel a bit twitchy. Additionally, the dynamic 4K resolution significantly improves the overall visual experience, making everything look better than ever.
From an artistic standpoint, this video game can be visually unappealing. It’s safe to say that the visuals were less than impressive back in 2015, and unfortunately, they haven’t aged well. The human character models leave much to be desired, with their lackluster facial features and lifeless expressions. The lip-syncing and facial animations are particularly disappointing.
In summary
The core gameplay loop of Fallout 4 remains strong, despite the fact that the surrounding adventure is starting to show its age, nearly ten years after its initial release. The addition of a smooth 60-fps performance mode will surely please many returning players. Roaming through post-apocalyptic Boston can still provide some enjoyment, especially with the reliable V.A.T.S. system at your disposal. However, it is undeniable that open-world games have made significant progress since the release of Fallout 4, which some may argue already felt outdated even at its launch in 2015.
Pros:
- The open-world design is both dense and engaging
- Engaging progression systems that keep you hooked
- V.A.T.S. continues to impress
- The performance on PS5 is impressively smooth
- Significantly decreased loading times
- Several poignant narrative moments
- The soundtrack creates a captivating atmosphere
Cons:
- Shows signs of significant deterioration in various aspects
- Unremarkable side quests and forgettable characters
- Lacking depth in the realm of role-playing
- An abundance of mundane tasks
- The character models are visually unappealing
Good 7/10
Gaming
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Review
Star Wars is one of the few pop culture franchises that won’t die. Andor shows that even in the galaxy far, far away, good stories can be told. After the controversial Star Wars Battlefront 2, Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order delivered a great game. Star Wars games are better three-and-a-half years later.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, like God of War Ragnarok, may appear like a retread, but play it to find how much better it is. Cal Kestis’ story continues with new planets, side content, and quality of life improvements. Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is one of the franchise’s best games.
Our brief review process always agreed. We only confirmed it 24 hours ago. Before a Day 0 patch, frame rate drops and screen tearing were severe. We loved the experience, but the launch was unacceptable. Version 1.02 saved Star Wars Jedi: Survivor in the final hour.
Performance Mode now mostly hits 60 frames per second at 1440p resolution. The occasional frame rate drop is nothing compared to what was standard before. Screen tearing is also gone.
However, the smooth frame rate makes Star Wars Jedi: Survivor easier to enjoy without any issues. Its vast worlds and breezier Dark Souls formula return. The Pyloon’s Saloon on Koboh is your home base for a long list of side content and collectibles.
Cal arrives on the backwaters planet to repair his ship after a story-focused introduction. One of the game’s most satisfying loops is reviving Rambler’s Reach Outpost, which becomes more important later. You can recruit and bring friends to the cantina by doing quests and meeting people. Exploration becomes more rewarding with the promise of new conversations and more missions if you meet a friendly person.
Characters make the story. While your goal of a new Jedi home on Tanalorr is intriguing, it’s the Mantis crew and Pyloon’s Saloon that will make you care. They’re charming, funny, and worth talking to.
Even if you don’t find a new home base, exploration is addictive, giving you one more place to search. With verticality and a large map, you could easily double the 25 hours it takes to beat the story.
Compared to Jedi: Fallen Order, combat hasn’t been expanded, but a new stance system lets you choose a lightsaber and control its use. Dual wielding, twin blades, and blaster use depend on the opponent and number of them. It expands your Force experience.
Meditation Points serve as Bonfires, death resets experience points, and the game has a slightly higher difficulty curve than other action-adventure games. You can customize the experience with multiple difficulty options.
Respawn Entertainment also brings back Metroidvania, teasing later powers and abilities in early areas. Puzzles are challenging and add to the exploration loop. The prize is customizing Cal, BD-1, and your lightsaber.
Star Wars’ quirky dialogue and music complete it. The former is stunning, with film-like tracks. Jedi: Survivor’s best feature is the latter. Before combat, droids and stormtroopers will talk about how they’ll kill the Jedi, only to be stabbed by a lightsaber seconds later. Good stuff.
Visuals aren’t. They’re inconsistent: cutscenes look great but gameplay doesn’t. In-game action could never match the game’s 147GB cutscenes. The PS5 version should support the DualSense controller, but its features are rarely used. Haptic feedback and adaptive trigger resistance rarely occur when using the Force.
Conclusion
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, like any good sequel, builds on the first game and improves it. Combat is fun and has more options, exploration is amazing, and Metroidvania puzzles and rewards are satisfying. It adds another crowning moment to 2023.
Pro:
- Worthy sequel
- Fun combat
- Enchanting discovery
- Fun puzzles
- Fantastic cast
- Music and witty dialogue
Cons:
- Minor framerate issues
- Visuals vary
Excellent 9/10
Gaming
The Season 3 DMZ Bundle in Call of Duty Warzone 2 has been labeled as ‘Pay-to-Win’ by some players
Activision is facing criticism once again as players of Call of Duty and Warzone 2 are accusing the company of introducing a “pay-to-win” bundle in the game’s real-money marketplace.
The Season 3 update in DMZ introduced a new progression system, as stated in the patch notes.
- It appears that the player’s usage of individual operators results in their activation for active duty. It is important to note that despite starting with 3 slots, only one Active Duty slot can be equipped simultaneously by players.
- It is worth noting that Active Duty Operators possess distinct persistent items, including Exfil Streak, Dog Tag Rarity, Backpack Type, Killstreak, Gas Mask, and Self Revive.
- It is imperative to note that in the event of a failed exfiltration, the gear, streak, and Dog Tag rarity of the specific Operator responsible will be reset. It is imperative to note that only the mentioned Operators will remain unaffected.
The only way to access more Active Duty Operator Slots and gain an advantage over your competitors is by paying a significant amount of money for exclusive perks. The development was met with disappointment from fans in the game’s subreddit, as anticipated. However, there were also instances of frivolity.
I would like to thank Activision for curing me of my Warzone addiction
by u/TheEternalGazed in CODWarzone
I would like to thank Activision for curing me of my Warzone addiction
by u/TheEternalGazed in CODWarzone
The reaction of the authorities is yet to be observed, considering the update was only released yesterday. Players have listed other grievances in similar threads.
All the P2W DMZ benefits IW added with today’s update
by u/TheRealPdGaming in CODWarzone
The question of whether fairness truly exists in the contexts of love and war is a matter of great debate and scrutiny. The question of whether or not these Active Duty Operator Slots can be accurately labeled as pay-to-win is a matter that warrants critical examination.
- Gadgets10 years ago
Why the Nexus 7 is still a good tablet in 2015
- Mobile Devices10 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs Galaxy Note 5: is there room for improvement?
- Editorials10 years ago
Samsung Galaxy Note 4 – How bad updates prevent people from enjoying their phones
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 5 2015 and Android M born to be together
- Gaming10 years ago
New Teaser For Five Nights At Freddy’s 4
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Google not releasing Android M to Nexus 7
- Gadgets10 years ago
Moto G Android 5.0.2 Lollipop still has a memory leak bug
- Mobile Devices9 years ago
Nexus 7 2015: Huawei and Google changing the game