• POLITICS
  • SCIENCE
    • Astronomy
    • Physics
    • Biology
    • Geology
    • Environment
    • Medicine and Health
    • Sociology
    • Psychology
  • MOVIES & TV SHOWS
  • TECHNOLOGY
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Virtual Reality
    • Bionics
    • Nanotechnology
    • Engineering
    • Robotics
    • Space Exploration
    • Transport
    • Industry and Service
  • GADGETS
    • Mobile Devices
    • Wearables
    • Consoles
    • Hi-Tech
  • GEEK CULTURE
    • Gaming
    • Comics
    • Thingamajigs
  • MUSIC
  • SOFTWARE
    • APPS
      • Android
      • iOS
      • Windows
  • HARDWARE
  • CARS
  • REVIEWS
  • Advertise
  • Geek Reply Jobs
  • Contact Us
Geek Reply
  • HOME
  • Editorials
  • Geek Squad
  • GeekReply Jobs
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Google+

  • LinkedIn

  • RSS

Editorials

The thinly veiled threats to trigger Article Five over NotPetya continue the time honored tradition of NATO saber rattling

The thinly veiled threats to trigger Article Five over NotPetya continue the time honored tradition of NATO saber rattling
Saul Bowden
Saul Bowden
July 3, 2017

The NotPetya attacks swept across Ulkraine and parts of Europe last week, crippling infrastructure and taking down the systems of major companies such as Mearsk. At first many analysts considered it to be another cybercrime attack but as security services have begun to pick apart the events of last week the evidence is mounting that it was something more. Not without just cause, the world began to suspect Russia and NATO has already making begun veiled threats that they may be forced to trigger article five in response to the attacks.  While it is nice that NATO is taking the threat of Cyber Warfare seriously, the threat to trigger article five amounts to little more than NATO saber rattling.

Article Five compels members to act on an attack against an allied state

Article Five is the foundation upon which NATO is built. It enshrines the principle an attack upon one member of the alliance is an attack on every member of the alliance, a concept also known as collective defense. There are NATO forces on permanent standby in order to ensure that this principle is upheld.

Article five

Article Five compels NATO members to come to the defense of any other member under attack

NATO has used article five in on a number of occasions in the past. The Iraq invasion following the 9/11 attacks was technically covered under article five of the NATO treaty. It has also been invoked in the wake of Russia’s interventions in Syria and the annexation of Crimea.

Given how essential collective security is to NATO it should not come as a surprise that some are considering invoking article five in a response to the NotPetya attacks. The problem is that there is no precedent for doing so.

Article Five is designed to help members to respond to an attack but we don’t know who was behind NotPetya

It could be possible to interpret NotPetya as an “armed attack” against a European  NATO member. In so far as NotPetya was designed to cause as much damage as possible and as such could be defined as weaponized. It is far more problematic however, to consider the attack an “act of war”.

NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defense Centre of Excellence (CCD COE) argued in a press release on the 30th of June that NetPetya was backed by state actors or a non-state actor with approval from a state. Their argument holds some water. The NotPetya attacks were relatively sophisticated and were clearly designed to cause chaos rather than rake in cash. This was the very argument put forward by secretary general Jens Stoltenberg on the 28th of June when he attempted to argue that NotPetya could trigger Article Five.

Article Five

Mr Stoltenberg’s arguments that NotPetya justifies triggering Article Five are not entirely without merit

The problem with their argument is that we have no evidence, other than supposition, that any state was involved in the NotPetya attacks. Yes, it is clearly weaponized, yes, we need to take steps in order to combat Cyber Warfare, No, we don’t know who did it. So who is behind attack that NATO is responding to?

NATO will blame Russia, even if there is no evidence that Russia was involved.

The implication in Mr StoltenBerg’s argument is obvious. Russia was behind the attack and NATO needs to band together against the old enemy. The problem with this line of reasoning is that there is absolutely no evidence that Russia is involved.

Article Five

Russia’s actions prove that its administration is a real, credible, threat but that does not give NATO justification to act without evidence

There are suspicions, reasonable suspicions, that Russia at least tacitly approved the attacks. There is even a precedent for Russian Cyber attacks in Ukraine but there is no evidence. Previous NATO actions against Russia, including the recent sanctions, have all been based on concrete evidence of Russian wrong-doing. Whether that be their interventions in Syria or the annexation of Crimea.

NotPetya has no evidence of Russian involvement. The thinly veiled threats to invoke Article Five against Russia in response are bluster, pure and simple. If NATO were to use their alliance in attempt to force further action against Russia over these attacks they’d be risking an escalation without evidence. A fact that Russia would jump on in order to discredit NATO.

Russia is being blamed because NATO is facing a crisis

The alliance is arguably at its weakest point in recent history. The President of the United States has repeatedly undermined the perception that America is committed to the principle of collective security. European nations are increasingly beginning to talk of a European Army. Something that until the events of the past year would have been considered unthinkable.

Mr Trump’s words that “NATO is obsolete” may well prove prophetic. Even if it is a self fulfilling prophesy. In order to prevent the collapse of the alliance, NATO has to keep its members focused upon the threat that Russia poses, rather than the antics of the American President. In order to do this, NATO needs to take every opportunity to highlight Russian aggression, real or imagined.

Article Five

Trump has not held back on his criticism of NATO, much to the concern of America’s allies

The problem with this strategy is that it risks escalating an already tense situation between NATO and Russia, as well as alienating certain members of NATO who are in favor of a more conciliatory approach. In essence NATO saber rattling strengthens the, broadly false, Russian accusation that the West acts hypocritically on the international stage. After all, WannaCry and NotPetya were only possible because the American NSA was hording exploits. This  perceived hypocrisy reduces NATOs capacity to act as a true peacekeeping force and strengthening Russia’s position.

However justified it may be, NATO needs to tone down the harsh rhetoric and focus on action

It is always difficult for a large international body to organize itself, especially one as complex as NATO. It is a testament to the organization’s worth that it has survived this far. Unfortunately NATO finds itself in a difficult position, faced with the elected leader of its largest member, the United States, openly questioning its worth there is a chance that it may collapse.

The CCD COE is right to highlight that Cyber Warfare is a growing threat but simply threatening to further sanction Russia over the cyber attacks will get NATO nowhere. The focus has to be on coordinating international efforts to fight Cyber Warfare through dialogue and cooperation. Even with the likes of Russia, should they choose to participate. Saber Rattling and bluster will get us nowhere, except perhaps a war that nobody will win.

W3Schools
Related ItemsArticle Fivefeaturedforeign affairsNATONotPetyaRussiaWorld News
Editorials
July 3, 2017
Saul Bowden
Saul Bowden @https://twitter.com/SaulBowden

You'll find me wandering around the Science sections mostly, excitedly waving my arms around while jumping up and down about the latest science and tech news. I am also occasionally found in the gaming section, trying to convince everyone else that linux is the future of the computer gaming.

Related ItemsArticle Fivefeaturedforeign affairsNATONotPetyaRussiaWorld News

More in Editorials

Final Fantasy VIII Remastered

5 Reasons You NEED To Play The Final Fantasy VIII Remaster

Mike GuarinoSeptember 3, 2019
Read More
10 Huge Games Still Coming 2019

10 Huge Games Still Coming In 2019

Mike GuarinoAugust 1, 2019
Read More
Microsoft E3 2019

5 Most Exciting Announcements From The Xbox E3 2019 Press Conference

Mike GuarinoJune 10, 2019
Read More
Super Mario Maker 2 Switch

3 Best Switch Games Coming In June 2019

Mike GuarinoMay 30, 2019
Read More

20 Most Anticipated Games We’re Expecting To Play In 2019

Christopher WheatleyDecember 28, 2018
Read More
Stranger Things tabletop RPG DnD

Tabletop RPGs: A Fun Way to Play

Andrew DoughtyDecember 12, 2018
Read More
Killjoys VRV

Killjoys: The Interesting Tale of Bounty Hunters…in Space?

Andrew DoughtyDecember 12, 2018
Read More

The Growing Complexity of Lore within Games

Andrew DoughtyDecember 11, 2018
Read More
Marvel Heroes Omega

Geek is Chic

Andrew DoughtyDecember 5, 2018
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Game Deals

  • Popular

  • Latest

  • Comments

  • gaming equipment
    Maintaining Your Mental and Physical Health While Gaming
    GamingDecember 16, 2020
  • Esports is now an Official Medal Event at 2022 Hangzhou Asian Games
    Opinion PiecesDecember 30, 2020
  • Stellar Data Recovery Professional for Mac
    Stellar Data Recovery Professional for Mac- It can surely save the day
    ReviewsSeptember 26, 2019
  • Esports is now an Official Medal Event at 2022 Hangzhou Asian Games
    Opinion PiecesDecember 30, 2020
  • gaming equipment
    Maintaining Your Mental and Physical Health While Gaming
    GamingDecember 16, 2020
  • How Futuristic Movies Compare to Reality
    Geek CultureOctober 27, 2020
  • The end of geo-blocking within the EU
    Opinion PiecesOctober 19, 2020
  • Just 10% Of iPhone X Users Want Apple To Remove The Notch, Survey Says – My WordPress Website says:

    […] There are lots of requests that Apple users are…

  • The 9 most plausible rumors in regards to the new iPhones – Mark Swarrts says:

    […] Just 10% Of iPhone X Users Want Apple To…

  • Onimusha: Warlords HD PS4/Xbox One Box Art Revealed - GameSinners says:

    […] mean for the series, as its success could result…

  • 5 Essential Tips to Setup a Web Hosting Business | Your Own Website says:

    […] Source link […]

Geek Reply

Greetings techies! We are Geek Reply, a website whose main goal is to bring you all the latest news and updates from within the industry and beyond. What can you expect to find here?

Professional journalism coupled with expository writing for the most part, but we also give our honest opinion or throw in a pinch of humor for good measure when we deem it necessary. Our team is comprised of enthusiasts from across a wide variety of fields ranging from smartphone junkies to camera nerds, and everything in between. But perhaps you were looking for your daily dose of science news or hoping to read about the latest apps. If that’s the case, don’t worry, you came to the right place.

GeekReply Secured with GeekReply Scured
Nintendo Switch GeekReply

Copyright © 2020 GeekReply - Webdesign & Marketing - iPublicitate

Stephen Hawking Claims Trump’s Climate Plans Will Turn the Earth into Venus
The solution to the North Korean missile threat is in China’s hands and they know it