Connect with us

Industry and Service

Inalienable Right to Privacy in the Digital Age

blank

Published

on

Digital privacy

The digital age has propelled discussion on the concept of an inalienable right to privacy for citizens. This issue transcends geopolitical boundaries. Generally speaking, the current global outlook on digital privacy aligns well with cultural worldviews about personal privacy. It is fact that societies may differ about the definition of privacy. However, there is no doubt that the concept is present in every facet of life on a daily basis. This is especially prominent when it comes to the power of digital information.

India’s Constitution and Protection of Personal Privacy

On July 19, India’s Supreme Court began hearings on whether the Indian constitution provides protection for fundamental rights to privacy. This is a serious case that will affect every facet of Indian society regardless which way the court rules. For instance, if the court rules that the constitution does indeed protect rights to privacy, then existing bans on beef and alcohol consumption will undoubtedly receive reviews. Likewise, there will be new arguments against the current law criminalizing homosexuality.

With this in mind, the laws governing user data collection are at stake. If India’s Supreme Court rules against constitutional protection of privacy, then the Indian government is free to collect any and all digital data. Such information includes spending habits, likes and dislikes, account balances and assets, family, friends, and everything else people record in digital format. Not surprisingly, people are justifiably wary about how the government will use such data. There are certainly countless examples of governments throughout history using information to advance agendas not in the best interest of the citizenry.

Concern about Exploitation and Commoditization of Personal Digital Data

People across the world are concerned with government access, use, and control of user data. The Indian government in May admitted that the data for around 135 million people had “leaked” online. While the government repeatedly said the data is secure, it is a major concern that hackers could acquire such data and use it illegally for profit.

Just recently, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that ISPs must comply with the gag order inherent in National Security Letters (NSLs). The gag order forbids institutions to whom the FBI sends an NSL from informing the target of an investigation. Our own Ule Lopez recently wrote about this. Critics of the ruling argue that this destroys our right to privacy.

Half a KB History of Personal Privacy in the USA

The history of the right to privacy in American law is quite fascinating. In fact, the US Constitution does not contain an explicit reference to any right to privacy. The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religion, speech, the press, the right to assemble peacefully, and to petition the government for redress of grievances. The Third and Fourth Amendments protect against the forceful housing of soldiers and against unreasonable searches and seizures, respectfully. The Constitution provides due process of law with the Fifth Amendment. Both the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments provide more broad protections. The Ninth maintains citizen’s security against the Constitution itself, while the Fourteenth protects life, liberty, and property.

Lawyers and lawmakers crafted the concept of the right to privacy using a mixture of these Amendments. The first explicit reference to privacy rights in American law dates to the 1920s, and since then various politicians, lawmakers, and privacy advocates have molded the concept according to their own goals. There are some landmark cases that have had greater impacts than others on this concept. For example, the Supreme Court cited the First and Fourth Amendments in Stanley v George to protect your right to possess and view pornography. The Fourteenth Amendment protects against forcing children to attend public schools as ruled in Pierce v Society of Sisters. Likewise, the Fourteenth protects Roe v Wade.

Personal Privacy in the Digital Environment = Wishful Thinking?

digital privacy

Obviously, the concept of right to privacy rolled over into the digital age. For the most part, lawmakers have refused to make a stand. While there were attempts to define the boundaries of personal privacy on the internet, the new administration has repealed them. Recently, individuals and organizations have participated in events promoting net neutrality. Of course this is a worthy fight, but it is not the same as protection of personal data. Nor does it provide an inalienable or fundamental right to digital privacy even though the two are often bundled together. In fact, the definitions of inalienable and fundamental are fascinating topics, but we will leave that for a philological debate.

Despite our desire for an alternative fact, when you enter into a contract with an ISP or do business with an online retailer, you are willingly entering into a relationship dictated by that entity. These entities can do what they want with said data within the boundaries of the law, which, unfortunately, does not always protect the citizen. Unless you have been living under a rock for the last 30 years, you should know that there is only one option for maintaining any semblance of control over personal digital data. Don’t use the internet. Even then, government records are digitized, so almost everybody has varying degrees of personal data in digital form.

What do you think about India’s case and personal privacy in the digital age? Is personal privacy something that can be achieved, or does any law require compromises and total privacy is just wishful thinking?

Archaeology, technology, science, movies and TV shows, video games, government and politics, reading sci-fi and fantasy, '60s/70s classic rock. These are the areas in which I spend my days (somewhere in there are food and travel...).

Bionics

Highly efficient in energy usage and exceptionally precise – A novel frequency comb has been developed by researchers at Stanford University

blank

Published

on

blank

Researchers at Stanford University have introduced a novel frequency comb, a highly accurate measurement tool. This device exhibits distinctive characteristics such as its compact size, great energy efficiency, and remarkable accuracy. Through ongoing advancements, this revolutionary “microcomb,”  as outlined in a paper published in Nature, has the potential to serve as the foundation for widespread implementation of these devices in common electronic gadgets.

Frequency combs are laser devices designed to produce lines of light that are uniformly distributed, resembling the teeth of a comb or, more accurately, the tick marks on a ruler. Over the course of around 25 years, these “rulers for light” have brought about significant advancements in several fields of precise measurement, ranging from timekeeping to molecule detection through spectroscopy. However, due to the need for huge, expensive, and energy-intensive equipment, the usage of frequency combs has primarily been restricted to laboratory environments.

The researchers found a solution to these problems by combining two distinct methods for reducing the size of frequency combs onto a single, readily manufactured, microchip-style platform. The researchers anticipate a range of uses for their adaptable technology, including the development of sophisticated handheld medical diagnostic gadgets and the implementation of ubiquitous greenhouse gas monitoring sensors.

According to Hubert Stokowski, a postdoctoral scholar in the laboratory of Amir Safavi-Naeini and the primary author of the paper, the design of our frequency comb incorporates the most advantageous aspects of emerging microcomb technology within a single device. “Our new frequency microcomb has the potential to be scaled up for compact, low-power, and cost-effective devices that can be deployed in virtually any location.”

Safavi-Naeini, an associate professor in the Department of Applied Physics at Stanford’s School of Humanities and Sciences and senior author of the study, expressed great enthusiasm regarding the recently showcased microcomb technology. This technology has shown promise in developing innovative precision sensors that are compact and highly efficient, potentially suitable for integration into mobile devices in the future.

The process of manipulating light
An Integrated Frequency-Modulated Optical Parametric Oscillator, commonly referred to as FM-OPO, is a novel device.

The tool’s intricate nomenclature suggests that it integrates two methodologies for generating the spectrum of unique frequencies, or hues of light, that comprise a frequency comb. One approach, known as optical parametric oscillation, entails the reflection of laser light beams within a crystal medium, resulting in the formation of coherent and stable wave pulses. The second method uses laser light to enter a cavity, then modifies the phase of the light. This modulation is accomplished by applying radio-frequency signals to the device, resulting in the generation of frequency repetitions that function as light pulses.

The utilization of these two microcomb methods has been limited due to their inherent limitations. The aforementioned concerns encompass energy inefficiency, restricted capacity to modify optical parameters, and inferior comb “optical bandwidth” characterized by the gradual fading of comb-like lines as the distance from the comb’s center rises.

The researchers adopted a novel method to address the difficulty by focusing on a very promising optical circuit platform utilizing thin film lithium niobate as a material. The material possesses favorable characteristics in comparison to silicon, which is the prevailing material in the industry. Two advantageous characteristics of this material are its “nonlinearity,” which enables the interaction of light beams of different hues to produce new colors or wavelengths, and its ability to transmit a wide variety of light wavelengths.

The components of the new frequency comb were fabricated by the researchers through the utilization of integrated lithium niobate photonics. These technologies for controlling light are based on advancements made in the well-established field of silicon photonics, which focuses on the production of optical and electronic integrated circuits on silicon microchips. Both lithium niobate and silicon photonics have built upon the semiconductors used in traditional computer processors, which originated in the 1950s.

According to Safavi-Naeini, lithium niobate possesses distinct characteristics that are not present in silicon, rendering it indispensable for the fabrication of our microcomb device.

Remarkably exceptional performance
Subsequently, the researchers integrated components from optical parametric amplification and phase modulation methodologies. The researchers held specific performance expectations about the new frequency comb system on lithium niobate chips; nonetheless, the observed outcomes beyond their initial expectations.

In general, the comb generated a consistent output instead of brief pulses, allowing the researchers to decrease the necessary input power by roughly ten times. The device also produced a comb that was comfortably flat, indicating that the comb lines located further away from the center of the spectrum did not diminish in intensity. This characteristic enhances the accuracy and applicability of the device in many measurement applications.

Safavi-Naeini expressed astonishment at the comb’s unexpected nature. “Despite our initial intuition that we would observe comb-like behaviors, our intention was not to create a comb of this exact nature. It took us several months to create the simulations and theory that elucidated its primary characteristics.”

In order to get additional understanding of their surpassing device, the researchers sought the expertise of Martin Fejer, who holds the esteemed positions of J. G. Jackson and C. J. Wood Professor of Physics, as well as a professor of applied physics at Stanford University. Fejer, in collaboration with his colleagues at Stanford University, has made significant contributions to the advancement of contemporary thin film lithium niobate photonics technologies and the comprehension of the crystal characteristics of this material.

Fejer (year) established a significant correlation between the fundamental physical principles that underlie the microcomb and the concepts explored in scientific literature during the 1970s. This connection is particularly relevant to the ideas put forth by Stephen Harris, a retired professor of applied physics and electrical engineering at Stanford University.

With additional refinement, the novel microcombs may be easily produced at traditional microchip foundries and have numerous practical uses, including sensing, spectroscopy, medical diagnostics, fiber-optic communications, and wearable health-monitoring systems.

“Our microchip has the capability to be integrated into any device, and the overall size of the device is contingent upon the size of the battery,” stated Stokowski. “The technology we have showcased has the capability to be integrated into a compact personal device, comparable in size to a phone or even smaller, and can be utilized for various practical functions.”

Continue Reading

Engineering

Ukrainian officials view ground robots as a significant development in warfare

blank

Published

on

blank

Milan — The Ukrainian government is currently witnessing a rise in the number of applications submitted by robotics manufacturers seeking to assess the effectiveness of their combat systems. This trend indicates the growing significance of unmanned ground capabilities, particularly in light of the current deadlock on the front lines with Russia.

Brave1, a government defense-technology hub responsible for the development of field-ready capabilities, has recently announced the submission of over 50 ground robotic systems and more than 140 unmanned ground vehicles for evaluation.

In order to improve the Ukrainian army’s capabilities on the battlefield, Brave1 announced on March 12 that it would acquire a sizable number of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) through United24. These UGVs are expected to have a transformative impact on the ongoing conflict, similar to the existing role of drones. The Ukrainian government runs a website called United24 that seeks to raise money for the country’s ongoing internal conflicts.

Over the past year, there has been a notable rise in the proliferation of such platforms in military operations, with their utilization and evaluation expanding to encompass a broader range of objectives. Ukrainian social media platforms have lately disseminated video content purportedly showcasing an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) with the capacity to deploy six anti-tank mines simultaneously.

The online images shared by Brave1 depict a diverse array of compact tracked and wheeled ground robots in motion, armed with firearms, engaged in the evacuation of injured dummies, and seemingly outfitted with technology designed for mine detection.

A prevailing pattern observed in Ukrainian unmanned robots is their tendency to be somewhat light and less weighty compared to their numerous counterparts available on the global market.

According to Nataliia Kushnerska, the project lead at Brave1, Ukraine gains a strategic advantage on the battlefield by employing advanced technological solutions that outperform their adversaries in terms of efficiency, innovation, and cost. These hardware and software products serve as asymmetric responses, capable of altering the configuration during confrontations against the formidable resources of the enemy. This information was conveyed in an email statement to Defense News.

“Ukraine has emerged as a prominent international center for defense technology, and the expansion of this industry will have a crucial impact on Ukrainian defense strategy for many years to come,” she stated.

A considerable quantity of weapons and explosives employed by Russian and Ukrainian military forces persist without detonation, presenting a potential hazard to both military personnel and non-combatants. As of April 2023, it is anticipated that almost 174,000 square kilometers of Ukraine were polluted with landmines.

The impetus to expedite the advancement of Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) stems from the want to deploy robots for the perilous task of extracting live munitions that remain on the battlefield.

 

Continue Reading

Industry and Service

There is confusion among some regarding the inclusion of “Jeff” on a list of nuclear superpowers

blank

Published

on

blank

Since the advent of nuclear weapons, we have resided in a world where a full-scale conflict has the potential to annihilate humanity on multiple occasions. Research has indicated that a mere 100 or around 100 bombs had the potential to trigger a global nuclear winter, resulting in the loss of up to 1 billion lives. As of 2023, our nuclear arsenal consists of approximately 12,500 weapons.

Maintaining a record of them is undeniably crucial. It is undesirable to find oneself in a situation similar to the United States, where six nuclear weapons are lost.

Currently, there are nine nations, namely Russia, the United States, China, the United Kingdom, France, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, and India, that possess nuclear weapons. According to a previous graphic by CNN, which relies on statistics from the Federation of American Scientists, Jeff ranks as the eighth largest holder of nuclear weapons.

Although this phenomenon occasionally reemerges, there is no cause for concern regarding the potential instigation of nuclear arms by an individual named Jeff, who harbors dissatisfaction.

Jeff is not a real person. It is an acronym for the Joint Evaluated Fission and Fusion Project, which is a group of countries working together to make a library of nuclear material. It’s possible that Jeff got put on the chart by mistake, making it the tenth largest nuclear weapons owner in the world for a very short time… on a bar chart.

Sorry, everyone. Jeff does not have any nuclear weapons. No matter who plays him—Goldblum, Bezos, or Daniels—this is true. But if it makes you feel better, Pepsi may have owned a fleet of Soviet boats for a short time.

Continue Reading

Trending